GPT Image 2.6 與 2.5：測試、定價與真實結果

GPT Image 2.6 是一次有意義的工作流程更新，而非簡單的質量分數刷新。 OpenAI 文檔中介紹了 2.6 系列，包含 gpt-image-2.6-sunburst 用於精細的視覺工作，以及 gpt-image-2.6-flare 用於更快的迭代。同一份文檔還增加了明確的複雜度控制、標記引導編輯、SVG 輸出及動畫 GIF 輸出。

ChatGPT 模型系列 包含用於撰寫創意簡報以及生成其視覺內容的工具；這些是製作工作流程中的獨立階段。

我們為包裝、資訊設計、商業靜物、時尚攝影、廣告及電影分鏡撰寫了六份工作簡報。每份簡報均未作修改地提交給兩個模型路由。十二個原創輸出展示了具體的錯誤和有用的成功之處；它們並不能確立整體模型排名。生成使用了 Broly/Anywhere 別名，未經獨立驗證的原生變體映射。

GPT Image 2.6 與 2.5：模型和測試設定

這些圖像並不能證明 Sunburst 對 Sunburst 或 Flare 對 Flare 的性能。 保存的任務響應僅識別通用版本別名。此外，質量=低是渲染質量，不是低複雜度或 Flare 模型的證明。官方模型和複雜度定義。

GPT Image 2.6 與 2.5：功能與編輯控制

• 文本渲染仍然是一項審查任務： OpenAI 的指南警告說，複雜文本、重複字符和結構化構圖仍然可能失敗。

• 令牌模型仍然處於核心地位： 輸出大小、質量、提示長度、參考圖像和緩存使用都會影響用量；模型命名不會產生固定的每張圖片價格。

• 原生 ID 很重要： 官方路由使用確切的 Sunburst 或 Flare 模型 ID。第三方服務可能會暴露諸如 gpt-image-2.6，應將其標記為路由別名。

商業標籤需要 商業使用權 以及獨立的產品事實核查和可讀的字母。

時間和輸出星級僅比較每個任務中這兩個提供商響應：秒數或圖像輸出令牌越少，星級越高。星級 = 5 × 較低值 ÷ 此值，四捨五入，最低 1。這些是相對樣本評級，不是官方模型效率分數；變體和某些返回的大小有所不同。

時間 = 供應商任務提交到完成，包括排隊時間；不是純粹的模型推理延遲。Token = 供應商報告的圖像輸出 token，不包括提示輸入。不同的供應商路由和未公開的原生變體使得無法進行官方的速度或 token 效率排名。

GPT Image 2.6 與 2.5：更難的文字、版面與空間測試

我們編寫了三份要求嚴格的工作簡報：帶數字表格的雙語包裝、帶規定連接路徑的九格海報，以及十二個具有分層遮擋的物體。每個提示都只向每條路由提交一次。所有六個首次輸出均已展示；沒有重新生成或修飾。

請求的設定： 每對使用相同提示，1024 × 1024，低品質，PNG，無參考圖像。 返回的設定不同： 所有 2.6 圖像和 2.5 網格均為 1024 × 1024；2.5 包裝和空間圖像為 1254 × 1254。我們比較的是約束合規性，而不是小文字清晰度或解像度優勢。未提供種子，且路由別名未經獨立驗證為原生 OpenAI 變體。

這些單個輸出的編輯評分：★★★★★ 在審查的檢查項上沒有可見問題；★★★★☆ 輕微修正；★★★☆☆ 重要修正；★★☆☆☆ 重大修正；★☆☆☆☆ 不可用。不是整體模型基準。精確的像素對齊和小文本清晰度不評分。

1. 雙語包裝和數字保真度

Create one square print-ready flat back-label design for a fictional tea brand on ivory paper, black type and dark green rules. No mockup, perspective, extra text or illustrations. Use a clear two-column grid, English left and Simplified Chinese right. At top render exactly: MOSS & KETTLE / 山苔茶室. Below render exactly: JASMINE GREEN TEA / 茉莉绿茶. Render these paired rows, preserving every number and punctuation: NET WT 80 g / 净含量80克; INGREDIENTS: green tea, jasmine flowers / 配料：绿茶、茉莉花; ORIGIN: Fujian, China / 产地：中国福建; BREW: 3 g + 180 ml / 冲泡：3克＋180毫升; WATER: 80°C / 水温：80°C; STEEP: 2 min / 浸泡：2分钟. Add a lower-left boxed table titled BREWING SCHEDULE with columns ROUND | WATER | TIME and exactly these three rows: 1 | 180 ml | 120 s; 2 | 180 ml | 90 s; 3 | 180 ml | 150 s. To its right put a distinct warning box reading exactly: KEEP DRY. RESEAL AFTER OPENING. / 避光干燥保存，开封后密封。 Across the bottom render exactly: LOT JG-0418 | BEST BEFORE 2028-04-18. Keep every line legible, no invented barcode, seal, logo, extra claims or watermark.

關鍵區別： 兩者都保留了主要的雙語內容和數字表格；返回的更大的 2.5 畫布妨礙了同類清晰度判斷。

2. 帶跨面板約束的九面板佈局

Create a square editorial information poster with a precisely aligned 3 by 3 grid of nine equal rectangular panels, read left to right then top to bottom. White background, black type, thin gray dividers; no perspective, extra words, logos or watermark. Put one large title above the grid exactly: NINE STEPS TO A BETTER LAUNCH. Panels must contain exactly the following numbered headings and second lines: top-left 01 BRIEF / One goal; top-center 02 AUDIENCE / Three interviews; top-right 03 RESEARCH / Five sources; middle-left 04 SKETCH / Two directions; center 05 BUILD / One prototype; middle-right 06 TEST / Six participants; bottom-left 07 REVISE / Fix the top issue; bottom-center 08 LAUNCH / Publish once; bottom-right 09 LEARN / Review after 7 days. Each panel contains one minimal black line icon appropriate to its heading, with identical icon size. Color only the center panel pale coral; leave the other eight white. Draw exactly eight teal connector arrows following this continuous snake path: 01 right to 02, 02 right to 03, 03 down to 06, 06 left to 05, 05 left to 04, 04 down to 07, 07 right to 08, 08 right to 09. Do not renumber panels to follow the snake. Align heading baselines within each row and icon centers within each column. Add exactly one footer below the grid: SMALL TESTS. CLEAR DECISIONS. Keep all text and arrows separate and readable.

關鍵區別： 兩者都保留了九個面板位置和八箭頭蛇形。在這對中沒有結構準確性贏家。

3. 十二個物件、材質區分和遮擋

Create a square photorealistic top-down still life on a plain matte ivory tabletop. Show exactly twelve objects total: one red ceramic mug, one blue glass tumbler, one green metal tin, one whole yellow lemon, one silver teaspoon, one closed black notebook, one orange pencil, one brass key, one white seashell, one purple ribbon strip, one clear glass marble, and one folded pink paper triangle. Arrange the first nine in a three-by-three grid: top row red mug, blue tumbler, green tin; middle row lemon, teaspoon, black notebook; bottom row brass key, white seashell, pink triangle. The teaspoon bowl points toward the blue tumbler and its handle points down toward the seashell. The orange pencil lies diagonally across the notebook from lower-left to upper-right, with both ends extending beyond the notebook. The purple ribbon runs horizontally behind the lemon and teaspoon but in front of the notebook: it must disappear under the lemon and spoon, then remain visibly on top of the notebook. The single glass marble is inside the blue tumbler and visible through its transparent side. The mug is empty; the tin is closed. Exactly those twelve objects, no saucers, lids as separate objects, duplicates, decorative marks, letters, logos or watermark. Keep all objects inside the frame, with realistic contact shadows and visibly distinct ceramic, glass, metal, paper and fabric materials.

關鍵區別： 2.6 增加了一個彈珠；2.5 保持十二個物體但增加了鑰匙字母。兩者都裁剪了絲帶。

密集的雙語標籤和連接器佈線在這些樣本中並未區分模型的準確性。擁擠的靜物暴露了特定的計數差異。每個簡報一次輸出無法建立重複任務中的可靠性。

GPT Image 2.6 與 2.5 在人物方面的對比：時尚、廣告和故事板

這三個簡報模擬了電商攝影師、廣告藝術總監和電影前期製作團隊的工作。我們檢查了可能迫使生產修改的細節：服裝結構、手與道具的互動、所需的重疊以及跨攝像機角度的服裝連續性。

每個原始提示詞在每個模型路由上提交一次，使用相同的請求 1024 × 1024、低質量 PNG 設置，且沒有參考圖像。所有六個首次輸出均未經修飾地包含在內。這測試的是單張四面板圖像內提示驅動的角色連續性，而非跨獨立請求的基於參考的身份保持。

這些單個輸出的編輯評分：★★★★★ 在審查的檢查項上沒有可見問題；★★★★☆ 輕微修正；★★★☆☆ 重要修正；★★☆☆☆ 重大修正；★☆☆☆☆ 不可用。並非整體模型基準。精確像素對齊和小文本清晰度未評分。

4. 電子商務：全身時尚與手部細節

Square professional e-commerce fashion photograph, one fictional adult female model age 30, full body head to shoes fully inside frame, neutral light gray studio background, soft even lighting, realistic skin texture. She has a short dark curly bob and wears an open rust-orange tailored blazer over a plain ivory crew-neck shirt, dark navy straight-leg trousers, and white low-top sneakers. The blazer has exactly two black front buttons on the model's right side and one flap pocket on each side. Her right hand holds the curved wooden handle of exactly one closed dark green umbrella pointing down beside her right leg; the umbrella tip touches the floor. Her left hand is raised to chest height with palm facing camera and all five fingers naturally spread and individually visible. No hand in a pocket, no jewelry, no handbag, no extra person, no text, no logo, no watermark. Natural anatomy, two arms and two legs, no merged fingers. Leave visible space around the head and both shoes. The photograph must let an online shopper inspect fabric, seams, buttons, the umbrella grip and the open palm.

關鍵區別： 兩者都展示了要求的姿勢，但把鈕扣放在了錯誤的一側。兩者都還不能作為產品準確的目錄圖片。

一張令人信服的模特照片仍然需要 精確的圖像編輯 當服裝結構與所售產品不同時。有吸引力的皮膚和面料並不能彌補錯誤的鈕扣位置。

5. 廣告：三人協作與遮擋

Square photorealistic lifestyle advertisement for an unbranded design studio. Exactly three fictional adults age 25 to 55 sit behind a rectangular light oak table, all faces and relevant hands visible. Left: a Black woman with short natural hair wearing a mustard-yellow sweater, holding exactly one red ceramic mug in both hands. Center: an East Asian man with round black glasses wearing a pale blue shirt, pointing with his right index finger at a blank cream paper sheet lying at the exact center of the table; his left hand rests flat on the table with all five fingers visible. Right: a white woman with shoulder-length auburn hair wearing a forest-green shirt, writing on that same sheet with exactly one black pencil in her right hand. The pointing finger must not touch the pencil or merge with the writer's hand. Put exactly one closed cobalt-blue notebook in the foreground, partially hiding the bottom edge of the paper but not the hands. Exactly these tabletop objects: one mug held by left person, one paper sheet, one pencil held by right person, one closed notebook. No laptops, phones, extra cups, text, logos or watermark. Coherent eye lines toward the shared paper, plausible wrists, distinct fingers, natural skin texture and soft window light. No extra or duplicated people or limbs.

關鍵區別： 2.6 遵循筆記本覆蓋紙張的重疊；2.5 留有間隙。當放置是廣告簡報的一部分時，這種差異很重要。

依賴於現有產品或人物的簡報帶來了一個單獨的挑戰：結合參考圖像 同時保持身份和放置。這些純文字輸出並不能證明這種能力。

6. 電影前期製作：四格角色連續性

Create a square photorealistic cinematic storyboard, exactly four equal panels in a precise 2 by 2 grid with thin white gutters. No text, captions, letters, numbers, logos or watermark. All four panels show the SAME fictional adult woman age 35: warm brown skin, short black bob ending at jawline, one distinctive white streak over her LEFT temple, a small round silver stud in each ear, mustard-yellow raincoat with exactly three black buttons, red knitted scarf, dark charcoal trousers, and a small teal crossbody bag with strap running from her RIGHT shoulder to her LEFT hip. Consistent facial identity, costume, white streak placement, bag color and strap direction in every panel. Scene: one quiet brick train platform in soft overcast daylight. Top-left: full-body front view, she stands facing camera holding a folded cream paper ticket in her right hand, left hand at her side. Top-right: waist-up three-quarter view from her right side, she looks at the same ticket held in right hand. Bottom-left: waist-up front view, she hands the ticket with right hand to a station attendant's left hand entering only from the right edge; show no attendant face or body. Bottom-right: full-body rear three-quarter view, she walks away along the same platform, empty right hand visible; the teal bag remains on left hip and the scarf and coat remain unchanged. Exactly one main character in each panel, and the single additional entering hand only in bottom-left. Natural anatomy and coherent light. Do not mirror the character or move the white streak to the opposite temple.

關鍵區別： 兩者都在後面板中切換了包的一側，並且錯過了要求的白色條紋一側。兩者都未通過嚴格的服裝連續性檢查。

對於考慮ChatGPT Images 2.5 的替代方案，反覆出現的角色連續性值得進行單獨的驗收檢查，而不是從一個有吸引力的肖像中推斷出來。

可以使用圖像蒙版和編輯指令來指定，但更改包或服裝仍需要檢查面部和周圍服裝是否保持完整。

GPT Image 2.6 與 2.5：官方定價對比

四個官方變體具有相同的標準令牌費率。 GPT Image 2.6 沒有列出比 2.5 更高的每令牌溢價；相同的費率並不能保證每張生成圖像的成本相同。

美元，標準費率，非批量或 GlobalGPT 訂閱定價。緩存費率為每百萬文字 token 1.25 美元，每百萬圖像 token 2 美元（如適用）；2.5 的緩存輸入定價適用於 Responses 圖像工具，而非直接的 Images 請求。輸出成本為 計費圖像 token × 30 美元 ÷ 1,000,000；大小、質素和模型特定的 token 消耗會改變總額。複雜度不單獨收費。 官方定價 · 費用和計費條件。

GPT Image 2.6 與 2.5：應該選擇哪個？

在這些樣本中沒有絕對的贏家。2.6 在一個廣告重疊方面處理得更好；2.5 則保留了擁擠物體的數量。兩者都未滿足服裝側面和故事板連續性的限制。請根據對您工作重要的錯誤進行選擇，並在得出官方模型排名之前比較明確的 Sunburst 或 Flare 變體。

文字保真度、參考保留和逼真材質是選擇 AI 圖像生成器；更高的版本號並不能解決所有權衡。

GPT Image 2.6 與 2.5：來源與測試限制

• OpenAI 圖像生成指南 — 2.6 控制、示例和工作流程說明。

• GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst 模型頁面 — 官方模型 ID 和定位。

• GPT Image 2.6 Flare 模型頁面 — 官方模型 ID 和定位。

• OpenAI 圖像生成定價 — 定價參考；無實測成本排名。

證據邊界：本文不聲稱原生 OpenAI 賬戶生成、已驗證的別名到 Sunburst/Flare 映射、實際 OpenAI 計費、長期 CDN 保留或普遍質量排名。它僅報告成功的本地輸出和上述記錄的官方來源。

GPT Image 2.6 與 2.5：最終結論

兩條路線都沒有贏得每項任務。使用圖像對來判斷你的工作所需的約束；未公開的 Sunburst/Flare 映射阻止了官方變體排名。