ElevenLabs 對決 Lyria 3 Pro 對決 Mureka:最佳 AI 音樂生成工具

2026 年最佳 AI 音樂生成工具 - Hero 3x2 v5
Independent same-prompt test

AI music generation is moving fast in 2026, but a polished demo does not tell you which model will handle your song best. This comparison puts ElevenLabs Music v2, Google Lyria 3 Pro, and Mureka v9 through the same three creative briefs: a vocal pop song, a cinematic instrumental, and a structure-control challenge.

All three music models are available through GlobalGPT’s multi-model platform. GPT created the two original lyric sets once, and we kept them unchanged across the music models. Results are separated into performance and efficiency so musical quality is not confused with request cost or generation time.

3 music models9 playable outputs3 controlled briefs

Quick Answer: How the Three Models Performed

  • 表現: ElevenLabs led lyric and structure control; Lyria matched the cinematic brief most closely.
  • Efficiency: ElevenLabs was fastest, while Mureka had the lowest task-reported charge and the longest outputs.

Model Overview: ElevenLabs Music v2, Google Lyria 3 Pro, and Mureka v9

Official Feature Overview
模型開發人員產品焦點Formats relevant to this comparisonOfficial product page
ElevenLabs Music v2ElevenLabsText-directed music and full-song generationMusic with vocals or instrumental outputElevenLabs Music
Google Lyria 3 ProGoogle DeepMindMusic generation from a written creative directionVocal and instrumental briefs entered through one promptGoogle DeepMind Lyria
Mureka v9MurekaAI song creation and background-music generationSeparate song and BGM routes in the tested APIMureka

The product-family descriptions above come from the developers’ public product pages. Exact request fields used in this article come from the Broly API schema checked on August 5, 2026.

What Is ElevenLabs Music v2?

  • Generates complete music from a written brief.
  • The tested route accepts creative direction and lyrics in one prompt.
  • Unique test control: explicit duration and instrumental-only settings.
ElevenLabs official Introducing Music v2 release page
ElevenLabs’ official Music v2 release page, checked August 6, 2026.

What Is Google Lyria 3 Pro?

  • The higher-quality Lyria 3 route selected for this comparison.
  • The tested schema accepts one combined music prompt.
  • Control challenge: no separate lyric, style, or duration fields in this route.
Google DeepMind official Lyria prompt guide
Google DeepMind’s official Lyria prompt guide, checked August 6, 2026.

What Is Mureka v9?

  • Uses separate Song and BGM routes.
  • Song requests separate exact lyrics from style direction.
  • Route used: BGM for Test 2; Song for Tests 1 and 3.
Mureka official Create Music interface with V9 selected
Mureka’s official Create Music interface with V9 selected, checked August 6, 2026.

Same-Prompt Music Tests

How we test: The same creative requirements go to all three models, with only the field mapping changed for each API.

  • Shared inputs: identical briefs and identical GPT-written lyrics from GlobalGPT.
  • 持續時間: every brief targets 90 seconds; only ElevenLabs exposes a duration field.
  • Efficiency: measured from submission to terminal status, including polling and network time.
  • Listening review: editor notes cross-checked with two-pass Gemini 3.6 Flash audio analysis; unreliable exact timestamps excluded.

Test 01Contemporary Pop Song With Vocals

90-second target112 BPMA minorAlto vocal

任務設定: Create a contemporary synth-pop song about two people leaving a city late at night and moving toward an uncertain future. The evaluation focuses on vocal naturalness, lyric preservation, hook clarity, arrangement, and whether the emotional lift reaches the chorus.

Show full test prompt
Create one completely original 90-second contemporary synth-pop song with a warm, expressive alto lead vocal. Use 112 BPM and A minor. The mood is hopeful, intimate, and cinematic. Begin with muted electric piano and a soft analog-synth pulse. Add round bass and tight electronic drums in the first verse, build tension in the pre-chorus, and open into a wide, memorable chorus with restrained background harmonies. Keep the lead vocal clear and centered with clean instrument separation. No spoken introduction, rap, crowd sounds, imitation of a real artist, or fade-out. End on a clear final chord.

Perform the exact lyrics below. Do not add, remove, replace, or reorder words or sections.

[Verse 1]
City lights fade behind our backs
Silent streets now lead the way
Midnight whispers, no looking back
A new horizon breaks the gray
[Pre-Chorus]
Hand in hand, we step unknown
Chasing dreams we call our own
[Chorus]
We’re alive in the quiet night
Finding stars beyond the skyline
Lost in shadows, yet so bright
Together, we’ll redefine
[Verse 2]
Footsteps soft on empty roads
Every breath a story told
No promises, just endless skies
In your eyes, the future lies
[Final Chorus]
We’re alive in the quiet night
Finding stars beyond the skyline
Lost in shadows, yet so bright
Together, we’ll redefine
Test 1 resultBest lyric consistency: ElevenLabs Music v2
  • ElevenLabs and Lyria had no clear lyric deviation across the checks.
  • ElevenLabs paired that consistency with the cleanest vocal/instrument separation.
  • Mureka sounded distinctive, but its blind transcript flagged likely substitutions.
RESULTSPlay all three outputs before comparing the notes.
Task winner

ElevenLabs Music v2

Test output

90.0s輸出42.0s時間$0.225指控
  • No clear lyric deviation detected.
  • Electronic synth-pop character with a noticeable intro.
  • Clean vocal and instrument separation.

Google Lyria 3 Pro

Test output

87.3s輸出50.3s時間$0.08指控
  • No clear lyric deviation detected.
  • Broad, theme-song-like lift with immediate vocal entry.
  • Strong finish, but the ending cuts off abruptly.

Mureka v9

Test output

170.7s輸出75.1s時間$0.045指控
  • Blind transcript flagged a likely lyric substitution.
  • Distinctive electronic, nu-disco-like character.
  • Extended instrumental outro made it much longer.

Test 02Cinematic Instrumental Music

90-second target82 BPMD minorNo vocals

任務設定: Build a cinematic cue with an audible narrative arc rather than a static loop. The evaluation focuses on motif development, orchestration, dynamic control, transitions, and whether the final section earns its larger scale.

Show full test prompt
Create one completely original 90-second cinematic instrumental cue for a dramatic science-fiction exploration scene. Use 82 BPM and D minor. No vocals, spoken words, whispers, choir, or human voice-like sounds. Begin quietly with a sparse felt-piano motif and low sustained strings. Introduce a subtle analog pulse after the opening, then build gradually with layered strings and restrained low percussion. Add brass only in the final third. Reach one clear emotional climax near the end without excessive loudness or distortion. Keep the piano motif recognizable and preserve clear separation between piano, strings, percussion, synth pulse, and brass. Use realistic orchestral timbres with a spacious but controlled mix. Avoid trailer impacts in the first half. Do not imitate an existing score, composer, or franchise. End on a resolved sustained chord rather than a fade-out.
Test 2 resultClosest cinematic brief match: Google Lyria 3 Pro
  • Lyria preserved the piano motif, gradual layering, late brass, and resolved ending.
  • ElevenLabs followed the arc closely but introduced an impact earlier than requested.
  • Mureka delivered a compelling different composition, with voice-like texture that broke the brief.
RESULTSListen for motif, orchestration, voice texture, and ending.

ElevenLabs Music v2

Test output

90.0s輸出20.9s時間$0.225指控
  • No voice texture detected.
  • Recognizable piano motif and controlled build.
  • An early impact weakened strict compliance.
Task winner

Google Lyria 3 Pro

Test output

84.0s輸出62.5s時間$0.08指控
  • Best match for motif, layers, late brass, and climax.
  • No voice texture detected.
  • Natural movement and a resolved ending.

Mureka v9 BGM

Test output

183.9s輸出75.4s時間$0.045指控
  • Voice-like “ah” textures broke the no-voice brief.
  • Violin-led, mournful opening grew into a late climax.
  • Distinctive, but several requested elements were replaced.

Test 03Song Structure and Prompt Control

90-second target104 BPMD majorFixed section order

任務設定: Create an alternative-pop song about repairing an old radio and hearing a distant reply through the static. The required order is Intro, Verse, Pre-Chorus, Chorus, Instrumental Break, Bridge, Final Chorus, and Outro. The evaluation focuses on structural compliance, lyric preservation, contrast between sections, and ending control.

Show full test prompt
Create one completely original 90-second alternative-pop song with a clear, expressive tenor lead vocal. Use 104 BPM and D major with modern alternative-pop production, natural pronunciation, and restrained vocal effects. No spoken narration, rap, imitation of a real artist, or fade-out. Preserve this exact section order and make every production change audible: Intro—about 6 seconds, filtered electric guitar and distant synth only; Verse—add dry bass and rim-click percussion; Pre-Chorus—add a rising pad without full drums; Chorus—bring in full drums, wider synths, and a clear melodic hook; Instrumental Break—about 8 seconds, echo the chorus melody without vocals; Bridge—reduce to piano and a close intimate vocal; Final Chorus—restore the full band, add backing harmonies and an octave guitar line, and make it larger than the first chorus; Outro—remove drums, return to filtered guitar, and finish on a clean final chord.

Perform the exact lyrics below. Do not add, remove, replace, reorder, or sing the parenthetical instrumental directions as lyrics.

[Intro]
(Instrumental)
[Verse]
Cracked dials hum a broken tune
Fingers trace the faded lines
Static whispers fill the room
Searching through the tangled signs
[Pre-Chorus]
Signals flicker, unclear sound
Waiting for a voice profound
[Chorus]
Can you hear me through the noise?
A distant call, a fragile choice
Static fades, a clearer voice
Hold on tight, we’ll find the noise
[Instrumental Break]
(Instrumental)
[Bridge]
Fragile hope in fractured light
Echoes soft, they pull me near
In the silence, you appear
[Final Chorus]
Can you hear me through the noise?
A distant call, a fragile choice
Static fades, a clearer voice
Hold on tight, we’ll find the noise
[Outro]
Whispers turn to song
We’re where we belong
Test 3 resultStrongest structure control: ElevenLabs Music v2
  • ElevenLabs made the eight requested sections easiest to identify.
  • Lyria created good section contrast but changed more supplied words.
  • Mureka kept a polished groove, yet the bridge and outro were less distinct.
RESULTSListen for the eight-part sequence and final-chorus lift.
Task winner

ElevenLabs Music v2

Test output

90.0s輸出20.9s時間$0.225指控
  • Clearest eight-part structure in the test.
  • Strong bridge and final-chorus contrast.
  • Break ran long; ending behaved more like a fade.

Google Lyria 3 Pro

Test output

89.5s輸出58.1s時間$0.08指控
  • Good eight-part flow and near-eight-second break.
  • Strong bridge-to-final-chorus contrast.
  • Blind transcript flagged changed early lyrics.

Mureka v9

Test output

167.1s輸出59.1s時間$0.045指控
  • Clear vocal hook and polished pop-funk production.
  • Less distinct section contrast through bridge and outro.
  • Extended guitar outro created the highest edit burden.

What the Tests Reveal About Each Capability

Capability Leaders From These Three Tests
Lyrics + structureElevenLabs Music v2

Most consistent supplied words and clearest eight-part structure.

Cinematic briefGoogle Lyria 3 Pro

Closest match to the requested motif, layers, brass timing, and ending.

Long-form interpretationMureka v9

Most stylistically independent outputs, with the greatest edit burden.

Task-level findings from three prompts—not a universal model ranking or speech-accuracy benchmark.

Generation Efficiency

Efficiency Comparison
Average generation timeLower is faster
ElevenLabs
27.9s
Lyria
56.9s
Mureka
69.9s
Task-reported chargeLower costs less
ElevenLabs
$0.225
Lyria
$0.08
Mureka
$0.045
Average output durationNot a quality score
ElevenLabs
90.0s
Lyria
86.9s
Mureka
173.9s
  • Complete test pack
    9 of 9 usable outputs
  • Total task-reported charge
    $1.05 · no music task rerun

Each bar group uses its own scale. Charges come from completed Broly task responses on August 5, 2026—not official provider pricing or GlobalGPT credits. Local time includes polling and network delay.

Comparing the Three Models Inside GlobalGPT

GlobalGPT keeps the lyric-writing and music-generation stages in one multi-model platform:

  • One place to compare: ElevenLabs Music v2, Google Lyria 3 Pro, Mureka v9, and GPT.
  • Shared test inputs: the same creative requirements, lyrics, and judging criteria.
  • Fair field mapping: each brief is translated into the fields its model route actually accepts.

Want to compare more than one music model before committing?

Explore AI models in GlobalGPT

Start with the same brief, listen for the differences that matter to your project, and keep the output that fits.

常見問題

What is the best AI music generator in 2026?

There is no universal winner from three prompts. In this test pack, ElevenLabs was strongest for lyric and structure control, Lyria followed the cinematic instrumental brief most closely, and Mureka offered the lowest task-reported charge and longest, most stylistically independent outputs.

Can these AI music generators create both vocals and instrumentals?

Yes, but the routes differ. ElevenLabs Music v2 supports vocal and instrumental requests, Lyria 3 Pro receives both kinds of briefs through one prompt, and Mureka v9 uses separate song and BGM routes in this test.

Did every model receive the same prompt?

The creative brief and lyrics are identical, but the request payloads are not. We map the shared instructions to each API’s required fields because ElevenLabs, Lyria, and Mureka expose different schemas.

Are the songs exactly the same length?

No. ElevenLabs returned 90.0 seconds in all three tests, Lyria returned 84.0 to 89.5 seconds, and Mureka returned 167.1 to 183.9 seconds. Only the tested ElevenLabs route exposed a duration field.

Is the listed request cost the same as a subscription price?

No. The efficiency section uses the charge exposed by each completed Broly task response. It does not represent an official provider subscription, an official provider API rate, or a conversion from GlobalGPT credits.

Can I use AI-generated music commercially?

Commercial-use rights depend on the service, account, plan, output, and current terms. Review the applicable provider and platform terms for your project; this creative test does not provide legal clearance.

Are all three models available in GlobalGPT?

Yes. ElevenLabs Music v2, Google Lyria 3 Pro, and Mureka v9 are available through GlobalGPT, allowing users to access multiple music models from one platform.

最後判斷

  • ElevenLabs Music v2: strongest controlFastest average run, exact 90-second outputs, best lyric consistency, and clearest fixed structure. Tradeoff: highest task-reported charge.
  • Google Lyria 3 Pro: strongest cinematic matchBest instrumental brief alignment and close-to-target duration. Tradeoff: abrupt Test 1 ending and lyric changes in Test 3.
  • Mureka v9: most independent interpretationDistinctive long-form tracks and lowest task-reported charge. Tradeoff: longest outputs and highest edit burden under strict briefs.
分享文章:

相關文章