Claude and ChatGPT are no longer “similar chatbots.” In 2025, they represent two different philosophies:Claude —— deep thinking, analysis, and writing clarity；ChatGPT (GPT-5.1) —— creativity, multimodality, real-time interactivity
But here’s the catch: switching between two tools creates workflow friction.And the combined cost? Yes — it stacks up faster than you’d expect. Which is why having them in one place became a must-have for many users.
On GlobalGPT, you get both Claude 4.5 and GPT-5.1 side-by-side — no switching apps, no toggling subscriptions.
Platform AI all-in-one untuk menulis, membuat gambar & video dengan GPT-5, Nano Banana, dan banyak lagi
What’s the real difference between Claude and ChatGPT in 2025?
Both models evolved significantly in 2025 — and the gap between them has shifted.Here’s the most accurate high-level breakdown:
Claude 4.5 vs GPT-5.1: Quick Comparison Table
| Fitur | Claude 4.5 | GPT-5.1 |
| Core Strength | Deep reasoning, long-form writing, coding accuracy | Multimodal generation, video/voice/image, versatility |
| Writing Style | Natural, human-like, stable | Structured, customizable, flexible |
| Coding | Best for large codebases & debugging | Best for prototyping & cross-modal UI |
| Multimodal | Image understanding only | Images, videos (Sora 2 Pro), voice |
| Context Window | 200,000–500,000 tokens | 128k (UI) to 1M (API) |
| Penelitian | Excellent with long documents | Strong external search + summaries |
| Terbaik untuk | Researchers, writers, developers | Creators, marketers, teams, students |
Claude represents deep intelligence—it thinks slowly, explains clearly, and handles complex logic without drifting off-topic. GPT-5.1 represents broad capability—it can process more types of data, work across more formats, and execute more diverse tasks in one session.
In practice, Claude feels like collaborating with a thoughtful senior analyst.
ChatGPT feels like collaborating with an entire creative studio.
Both are exceptional — but exceptional in different ways.
Claude vs ChatGPT model lineup (2025 updated guide)
Since late 2024 and throughout 2025, both Anthropic and OpenAI have rebuilt their model families from the ground up.
To make the comparison meaningful, we must look at each ecosystem as a family of models—not a single version. That’s why we created the updated 2025 Claude vs ChatGPT model map below, reflecting all major releases, deprecations, and current flagship to
Model Lineup: Claude 4.5 Family vs GPT-5.1 Family
| Kategori | Claude Models | ChatGPT Models |
| Flagship | Claude Soneta 4.5 | GPT-5.1 (default for Plus/Team) |
| Advanced Reasoning | Claude Opus 4.1 | o1 / o1-mini |
| Fast Lightweight | Claude Haiku 3.5 | GPT-5.1 Instant |
| Multimodal | Strong image analysis only | GPT-5.1 Image + Sora 2 Pro (video) |
| API Options | Stable + cheaper input tokens | More variants + cheaper output tokens |
The table shows how Claude 4.5 dan GPT-5.1 now represent two very different model ecosystems. Claude’s lineup focuses on reasoning depth dan cost-efficient performance—with Sonnet 4.5 as the balanced flagship, Opus 4.1 for heavier reasoning tasks, and Haiku 3.5 for fast lightweight use. In contrast, GPT-5.1’s family emphasizes breadth and multimodality: the core GPT-5.1 model, o1-series for advanced reasoning, Instant for speed, and full support for image + Sora 2 Pro video generation.
Singkatnya: Claude is optimized for thinking; GPT-5.1 is optimized for creating.
Which AI writes better in 2025 — Claude or ChatGPT?
This is the category where users notice the difference immediately.
Claude 4.5 writes more like a human—warm, intuitive, emotionally aware, and consistently smooth across long documents. It feels like a writer who naturally understands tone and flow.
GPT-5.1 writes more like a high-precision system—structured, exact, highly controllable, and great at switching styles on command. It’s less “human,” but far better at clean structure, SEO-optimized output, and turning text into multiple formats.
Writing Performance Comparison
| Writing Metric | Claude 4.5 | GPT-5.1 |
| Long-form consistency | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Natural tone | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Structure & outlines | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ |
| Repetition control | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Creative storytelling | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Business/SEO writing | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ |
Examples
- Claude 4.5 can maintain voice, tone, and emotional consistency across a 20,000-word research paper without drifting or repeating itself.
- GPT-5.1 can take that same research paper and instantly generate:
- A full YouTube video script
- A 20-slide visual deck
- A structured summary
- A set of images via GPT-5.1 Image
- Even a short Sora 2 Pro demo video
🏆 Winner:
Claude 4.5 → Best for writing, storytelling, essays, reports, research papers
GPT-5.1 → Best for transforming writing into content, especially multimodal assets
Which AI is better for coding — Claude or ChatGPT?
When it comes to programming in 2025, developers generally agree on one thing: Claude is better for engineers; GPT-5.1 is better for builders.
Claude 4.5 shines in deep engineering workflows. It handles multi-file reasoning, long codebases, and complex refactors with impressive stability. Many developers report that Claude introduces fewer hallucinated functions, writes cleaner diffs, and explains architecture decisions more like a senior engineer.
GPT-5.1, meanwhile, excels in speed and versatility. It generates full apps quickly, pairs naturally with multimodal inputs (screenshots, UI mocks, diagrams), and can turn ideas into working prototypes with fewer back-and-forth iterations. With GPT-5.1 Image + Sora 2 Pro, you can even convert UI sketches into frontend code or video demos.
Coding & Debugging Comparison
| Coding Ability | Claude 4.5 | GPT-5.1 |
| Multi-file reasoning | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Debugging accuracy | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Refactoring | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Explaining code | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| Framework prototyping | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ |
| UI/code-to-image workflows | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★★ |
| Tools | Artifacts (real-time preview) | Canvas (multimodal workspace) |
🏆 Winner:
Claude 4.5 → Best for engineers needing deep reasoning, refactoring, and large-codebase understanding.
GPT-5.1 → Best for fast app building, multimodal coding, and turning ideas into working products quickly.
Multimodal comparison — images, video, voice
When it comes to multimodality, the difference between Claude and ChatGPT isn’t subtle — it’s massive.
Claude 4.5 remains text-first with strong image analysis, but it cannot generate images or video. It’s great for reading charts, interpreting photos, or extracting data from documents, but that’s where multimodality ends.
GPT-5.1, on the other hand, is a full creative studio. It handles image generation, video creation, voice interaction, UI interpretation, screenshot-to-code workflows, and waktu nyata multimodal reasoning — all in one place. Combined with Sora 2 Pro video generation, it becomes the strongest multimodal model available to everyday users.
Multimodal Capabilities Table
| Capability | Claude 4.5 | GPT-5.1 |
| Image uploading & analysis | ✔ Excellent | ✔ Excellent |
| Image generation | ✘ Not supported | ✔ GPT-5.1 Image |
| Video generation | ✘ No | ✔ Sora 2 Pro |
| AI voice | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes (more natural) |
| Real-time vision | Terbatas | ✔ Live Camera Vision |
| Document/PDF extraction | ✔ Best in class | ✔ Strong |
🏆 Winner:
GPT-5.1 (by a landslide)
If your work involves visuals, ads, UGC, product demos, animations, design concepts, educational videos, or creative workflows, GPT-5.1 dominates every category. Claude simply doesn’t compete in this space yet.
in short:
- Need visuals? → GPT-5.1
- Need video? → GPT-5.1 + Sora 2 Pro
- Need voice, screenshots, UI-to-code? → GPT-5.1
Claude vs ChatGPT for research & analysis
This is one of the closest categories. Both Claude 4.5 and GPT-5.1 are excellent for research, but they excel in different ways.
Claude 4.5 is best for deep analysis. It handles long documents, keeps context, explains complex arguments, and produces clear insights — making it a favorite for academic, legal, and technical work.
GPT-5.1 is better for search-heavy research. With Bing Search, Deep Research mode, and strong multimodal input, it quickly gathers facts, compares sources, and builds structured summaries across the web.
Research Performance
| Research Category | Claude 4.5 | GPT-5.1 |
| Long document reading | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Extracting insights | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| Fact-checking | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Web search | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ |
| Technical analysis | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Market research | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ |
| Dataset interpretation | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
🏆 Winner:
- Claude 4.5 → Best for analysis, deep reading, multi-step reasoning, and long-form synthesis
- GPT-5.1 → Best for search-heavy tasks, fact collection, waktu nyata updates, and cross-source research
If your work involves reading a 200-page PDF and extracting insights, Claude is the better pick. If you need up-to-date data, citations, market comparisons, or multi-source fact gathering, GPT-5.1 is the stronger research engine.
Pricing comparison (2025)
Here’s what it costs to use each tool individually — and how GlobalGPT compares when you want access to both ecosystems without paying for two subscriptions.
Pricing Breakdown
| Plan / Platform | Harga Bulanan | Includes | Terbaik untuk |
| ChatGPT Plus | $20/mo | GPT-5.1, GPT-5.1 Image, Sora 2 Pro access, multimodal tools | Users who need images + video + general AI |
| ChatGPT Pro | $200/mo | Advanced reasoning (o1), Deep Research, higher limits | Heavy power users, devs, researchers |
| Claude Pro | $20/mo | Claude 4.5 Sonnet, 200k context | Long-form writing, analysis, coding |
| Claude Max | $100/mo+ | Sonnet 4.5 + limited Opus 4.1 | Professional writers & engineers |
| GlobalGPT | $5.8-25/mo | GPT-5.1 + Claude 4.5 + Sora 2 Pro + Veo 3.1 + Unikorn + 100+ models | Users who want everything in one place |
- ChatGPT is cheaper for multimodal creators Because Sora 2 Pro video dan GPT-5.1 Images are included in Plus.
- Claude is cheaper for high-volume writers & coders Thanks to significantly lower input token pricing and stable long-context performance.
- GlobalGPT is the cheapest way to use both ecosystems at once Instead of paying $20 + $20 = $40/month, GlobalGPT gives: all in one subscription, less than the price of one plan.
Claude 4.5 vs GPT-5.1 — Which One Should YOU Choose?
(Keyword variations: which AI to choose 2025, Claude or ChatGPT)
Here’s the honest truth: the best choice depends entirely on what you want to do.
Choose Claude 4.5 if you need:
- Long-form writing or academic research
- Deep analysis and complex reasoning
- Multi-file coding or large codebase understanding
- High-accuracy, stable output
- A model that “thinks deeply” and holds long context
Choose GPT-5.1 if you need:
- Image generation, video creation (Sora 2 Pro), or visual workflows
- Real-time voice, screenshots, or UI-building assistance
- Fast prototyping and rapid idea-to-product iteration
- Multimodal tasks involving text + image + audio + video
- Team collaboration and cross-format content creation
The truth — most users need both
This is the hidden reality that most comparison articles avoid:
✔ Claude gives you depth
✔ ChatGPT gives you breadth
Using both leads to better output 90% of the time, based on user tests across writing, research, coding, and creation workflows.
But holding two subscriptions is expensive — and inefficient.
That’s why all-in-one AI platforms are becoming the new trend.
Final Recommendation — Use Both on GlobalGPT
Most professionals quickly realize they need Claude dan ChatGPT. This is the hidden reality that most comparison articles avoid:
✔ Claude gives you depth
✔ ChatGPT gives you breadth
GlobalGPT gives you both —All in one platform — plus 100+ extra models.
No switching apps, no double subscriptions, no invite codes.
👉 If you want the full power of Claude 4.5 and GPT-5.1 together, try GlobalGPT here！
