Melhor solucionador matemático de IA (2026): Ferramentas testadas para obter resultados precisos

Melhor solucionador matemático de IA (2026) Ferramentas testadas para resultados precisos
Fresh test, July 28, 2026: We ran the same five-problem math test through GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5, and Gemini 3.6 Flash using one OpenAI-compatible API workflow. All three solved all five questions correctly and verified their answers. The meaningful differences in this small test were response style and single-run latency—not correctness.

Resposta rápida: There was no accuracy winner in our current test. GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5, and Gemini 3.6 Flash each scored 5/5. Gemini 3.6 Flash returned first at 17.45 seconds, Claude Opus 5 followed at 17.89 seconds, and GPT-5.6 Sol took 32.85 seconds. Those times come from one API request per model, so they should not be treated as a universal speed benchmark.

The best AI math solver is the one that gets the answer right, shows a method you can audit, follows the requested format, and checks for hidden conditions. That is why our test included ordinary algebra, a geometry word problem, multi-step percentages, an extraneous-root trap, and calculus—not just easy final-answer questions.

How We Tested the Best AI Math Solvers

We tested the newest relevant models available through the same approved API connection: GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5, and Gemini 3.6 Flash. The current model names were checked against the available API catalog and the providers’ current pages for GPT-5.6, Claude Opus 5, e Gemini 3,6 Flash.

Each model received the same system instruction and the same five questions in one request. We did not supply a temperature or model-specific sampling setting. Every answer had to include steps, a final answer, and verification. No web search or external math tool was requested.

Score areaWhat we checkedPeso
CorrectnessCorrect final result on all five questions50%
Step qualityAuditable method with the important transformations shown20%
Instruções a seguirRequested labels and complete coverage of every task15%
VerificaçãoBack-substitution, condition checks, or differentiation15%

Five questions are enough to expose obvious weaknesses, but not enough to prove that one model is best across every branch of mathematics. For a wider student-tool comparison, see the best AI tools for homework.

Real API Test Results at a Glance

ModeloCorrect answersCorrectnessEtapasInstruções a seguirVerificaçãoTotalSingle-run latency
GPT-5.6 Sol5/550/5020/2015/1515/15100/10032.85 s
Claude Opus 55/550/5020/2015/1515/15100/10017.89 s
Gemini 3,6 Flash5/550/5020/2015/1515/15100/10017.45 s

Veredicto: all three models tied on mathematical correctness and verification in this test. Gemini 3.6 Flash was the fastest by a small margin over Claude Opus 5. GPT-5.6 Sol produced the most spacious, highly structured answer, but it was slower in this single run. Do not turn these three latency numbers into a general speed ranking without repeated tests.

If you are deciding between an OpenAI model and alternatives, the 2026 ChatGPT alternatives for math comparison covers the wider choice set.

The Five Math Problems We Used

Test 1: Algebra and Symmetric Expressions

Math ability: Algebra · identity use · equation recovery

Test 1: Algebra and Symmetric Expressions
Modelo: GPT-5.6 Sol · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Algebra · identity use · equation recovery

Entrada

Q1 — Algebra: Real numbers x and y satisfy x + y = 11 and xy = 24. Find x^2 + y^2, then identify the unordered pair {x,y}.

Expected answer / scoring key

x²+y²=73; {x,y}={3,8}. Must use the given sum/product consistently and verify both values.

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models used the symmetric-identity shortcut, recovered 3 and 8 from the quadratic, and verified the sum, product, and target value.

Response time: 32.85 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
### Steps

Given
\[
x+y=11,\qquad xy=24.
\]

Use
\[
x^2+y^2=(x+y)^2-2xy.
\]

Thus
\[
x^2+y^2=11^2-2(24)=121-48=73.
\]

To identify \(x\) and \(y\), they must be the roots of
\[
t^2-(x+y)t+xy=0,
\]
so
\[
t^2-11t+24=0.
\]

Factoring:
\[
(t-3)(t-8)=0.
\]

Hence the two values are \(3\) and \(8\).

### Final answer

\[
\boxed{x^2+y^2=73},\qquad \boxed{\{x,y\}=\{3,8\}}.
\]

### Verification

\[
3+8=11,\qquad 3\cdot 8=24,
\]
and
\[
3^2+8^2=9+64=73.
\]
Test 1: Algebra and Symmetric Expressions
Modelo: Claude Opus 5 · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Algebra · identity use · equation recovery

Entrada

Q1 — Algebra: Real numbers x and y satisfy x + y = 11 and xy = 24. Find x^2 + y^2, then identify the unordered pair {x,y}.

Expected answer / scoring key

x²+y²=73; {x,y}={3,8}. Must use the given sum/product consistently and verify both values.

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models used the symmetric-identity shortcut, recovered 3 and 8 from the quadratic, and verified the sum, product, and target value.

Response time: 17.89 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
Steps
- (x+y)² = x² + 2xy + y², so x² + y² = 11² �?? 2(24) = 121 �?? 48 = 73.
- x and y are roots of t² �?? 11t + 24 = 0 = (t �?? 3)(t �?? 8).

Final answer
x² + y² = 73; {x, y} = {3, 8}.

Verification
3 + 8 = 11 �??, 3·8 = 24 �??, 9 + 64 = 73 �??. Discriminant 121 �?? 96 = 25 > 0, so both roots are real.
Test 1: Algebra and Symmetric Expressions
Modelo: Gemini 3.6 Flash · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Algebra · identity use · equation recovery

Entrada

Q1 — Algebra: Real numbers x and y satisfy x + y = 11 and xy = 24. Find x^2 + y^2, then identify the unordered pair {x,y}.

Expected answer / scoring key

x²+y²=73; {x,y}={3,8}. Must use the given sum/product consistently and verify both values.

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models used the symmetric-identity shortcut, recovered 3 and 8 from the quadratic, and verified the sum, product, and target value.

Response time: 17.45 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
Steps:
1. Use the algebraic identity $x^2 + y^2 = (x + y)^2 - 2xy$.
2. Substitute the given values $x + y = 11$ and $xy = 24$:
   $$x^2 + y^2 = 11^2 - 2(24) = 121 - 48 = 73$$
3. To find $x$ and $y$, construct the quadratic equation whose roots are $x$ and $y$:
   $$t^2 - (x+y)t + xy = 0 \implies t^2 - 11t + 24 = 0$$
4. Factor the quadratic equation:
   $$(t - 3)(t - 8) = 0 \implies t = 3 \text{ or } t = 8$$

Final answer:
$x^2 + y^2 = 73$; Unordered pair $\{x, y\} = \{3, 8\}$.

Verification:
$3 + 8 = 11$, $3 \times 8 = 24$, and $3^2 + 8^2 = 9 + 64 = 73$.

Group takeaway: All three models used the symmetric-identity shortcut, recovered 3 and 8 from the quadratic, and verified the sum, product, and target value.

Test 2: Geometry Word Problem

Math ability: Geometry · equation setup · uniqueness

Test 2: Geometry Word Problem
Modelo: GPT-5.6 Sol · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Geometry · equation setup · uniqueness

Entrada

Q2 — Geometry/word problem: A rectangle has perimeter 34 cm and diagonal 13 cm. Find its side lengths and area. Explain why the dimensions are determined.

Expected answer / scoring key

Sides 5 cm and 12 cm; area 60 cm². Must connect perimeter and diagonal conditions and explain uniqueness up to side order.

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models formed a+b=17 and a²+b²=169, derived ab=60, found 5 and 12, and checked the perimeter and diagonal.

Response time: 32.85 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
### Steps

Let the positive side lengths be \(a\) and \(b\).

The perimeter is \(34\) cm:
\[
2(a+b)=34,
\]
so
\[
a+b=17.
\]

The diagonal is \(13\) cm, so by the Pythagorean theorem,
\[
a^2+b^2=13^2=169.
\]

Using
\[
(a+b)^2=a^2+b^2+2ab,
\]
we obtain
\[
17^2=169+2ab.
\]

Therefore,
\[
289=169+2ab,
\]
\[
2ab=120,
\]
\[
ab=60.
\]

The side lengths are roots of
\[
t^2-17t+60=0.
\]

Factoring:
\[
(t-5)(t-12)=0.
\]

Thus the side lengths are \(5\) cm and \(12\) cm. The area is
\[
A=ab=60\text{ cm}^2.
\]

The dimensions are determined because their sum and product are fixed. The quadratic has exactly the two positive roots \(5\) and \(12\), which give the same rectangle up to interchanging length and width.

### Final answer

\[
\boxed{\text{Side lengths: }5\text{ cm and }12\text{ cm}}
\]
\[
\boxed{\text{Area: }60\text{ cm}^2}
\]

### Verification

Perimeter:
\[
2(5+12)=2(17)=34\text{ cm}.
\]

Diagonal:
\[
\sqrt{5^2+12^2}=\sqrt{25+144}=\sqrt{169}=13\text{ cm}.
\]

Area:
\[
5\cdot 12=60\text{ cm}^2.
\]
Test 2: Geometry Word Problem
Modelo: Claude Opus 5 · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Geometry · equation setup · uniqueness

Entrada

Q2 — Geometry/word problem: A rectangle has perimeter 34 cm and diagonal 13 cm. Find its side lengths and area. Explain why the dimensions are determined.

Expected answer / scoring key

Sides 5 cm and 12 cm; area 60 cm². Must connect perimeter and diagonal conditions and explain uniqueness up to side order.

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models formed a+b=17 and a²+b²=169, derived ab=60, found 5 and 12, and checked the perimeter and diagonal.

Response time: 17.89 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
Steps
- Let sides be a, b > 0. Perimeter: 2(a+b) = 34 �?? a + b = 17.
- Diagonal (Pythagoras): a² + b² = 169.
- 2ab = (a+b)² �?? (a²+b²) = 289 �?? 169 = 120 �?? ab = 60.
- a, b are roots of t² �?? 17t + 60 = 0 = (t �?? 5)(t �?? 12).

Final answer
Sides 5 cm and 12 cm; area 60 cm².

Verification
2(5+12) = 34 �??, 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169 = 13² �??, area = 60 �??.
Why determined: the two conditions fix the sum and product of the side lengths, and a monic quadratic is uniquely determined by its sum and product of roots. Discriminant 289 �?? 240 = 49 > 0 gives two positive roots, which are the same rectangle up to relabeling a and b �?? so the dimensions are unique as an unordered pair.
Test 2: Geometry Word Problem
Modelo: Gemini 3.6 Flash · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Geometry · equation setup · uniqueness

Entrada

Q2 — Geometry/word problem: A rectangle has perimeter 34 cm and diagonal 13 cm. Find its side lengths and area. Explain why the dimensions are determined.

Expected answer / scoring key

Sides 5 cm and 12 cm; area 60 cm². Must connect perimeter and diagonal conditions and explain uniqueness up to side order.

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models formed a+b=17 and a²+b²=169, derived ab=60, found 5 and 12, and checked the perimeter and diagonal.

Response time: 17.45 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
Steps:
1. Let the side lengths be $a > 0$ and $b > 0$.
2. The perimeter equation is $2(a + b) = 34 \implies a + b = 17$.
3. By the Pythagorean theorem, the diagonal gives $a^2 + b^2 = 13^2 = 169$.
4. Use $(a + b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 + 2ab$:
   $$17^2 = 169 + 2ab \implies 289 = 169 + 2ab \implies 2ab = 120 \implies ab = 60$$
5. The area is $A = ab = 60\text{ cm}^2$.
6. Side lengths $a$ and $b$ are the positive roots of $t^2 - 17t + 60 = 0$:
   $$(t - 5)(t - 12) = 0 \implies t = 5 \text{ or } t = 12$$
7. **Why dimensions are determined:** The perimeter and diagonal uniquely fix both the sum $(a+b = 17)$ and product $(ab = 60)$ of the positive side lengths. A system specifying the sum and product of two numbers uniquely defines the set of roots of a quadratic polynomial, giving a unique pair of side lengths up to order.

Final answer:
Side lengths: $5\text{ cm}$ and $12\text{ cm}$; Area: $60\text{ cm}^2$. The dimensions are determined because perimeter and diagonal uniquely fix the sum and product of the adjacent side lengths, leading to a unique positive quadratic solution set.

Verification:
Perimeter: $2(5 + 12) = 34\text{ cm}$. Diagonal: $\sqrt{5^2 + 12^2} = \sqrt{25 + 144} = \sqrt{169} = 13\text{ cm}$. Area: $5 \times 12 = 60\text{ cm}^2$.

Group takeaway: All three models formed a+b=17 and a²+b²=169, derived ab=60, found 5 and 12, and checked the perimeter and diagonal.

Test 3: Multi-Step Percentage Reasoning

Math ability: Arithmetic · sequential percentages · verification

Test 3: Multi-Step Percentage Reasoning
Modelo: GPT-5.6 Sol · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Arithmetic · sequential percentages · verification

Entrada

Q3 — Multi-step reasoning: A store marks an item up by 25% from its cost, then gives a 20% discount on the marked price. The customer pays $120 before tax. Find the original cost and the net percentage change from cost to the paid price.

Expected answer / scoring key

Original cost $120; net change 0%. Must multiply 1.25×0.80 rather than subtract percentage points.

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models correctly recognized that the sequential multipliers cancel and verified the $120 → $150 → $120 path.

Response time: 32.85 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
### Steps

Let the original cost be \(C\).

A \(25\%\) markup multiplies the cost by
\[
1+0.25=1.25.
\]

The marked price is therefore
\[
1.25C.
\]

A \(20\%\) discount means the customer pays \(80\%\) of the marked price:
\[
0.80(1.25C)=120.
\]

Since
\[
0.80\cdot 1.25=1,
\]
the equation becomes
\[
C=120.
\]

The paid price equals the original cost, so the net percentage change is
\[
\frac{120-120}{120}\cdot 100\%=0\%.
\]

### Final answer

\[
\boxed{\text{Original cost}=\$120}
\]
\[
\boxed{\text{Net percentage change}=0\%}
\]

### Verification

A \(25\%\) markup on \(\$120\) gives
\[
120(1.25)=\$150.
\]

A \(20\%\) discount on \(\$150\) gives
\[
150(0.80)=\$120.
\]

Thus the paid price is exactly equal to the original cost.
Test 3: Multi-Step Percentage Reasoning
Modelo: Claude Opus 5 · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Arithmetic · sequential percentages · verification

Entrada

Q3 — Multi-step reasoning: A store marks an item up by 25% from its cost, then gives a 20% discount on the marked price. The customer pays $120 before tax. Find the original cost and the net percentage change from cost to the paid price.

Expected answer / scoring key

Original cost $120; net change 0%. Must multiply 1.25×0.80 rather than subtract percentage points.

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models correctly recognized that the sequential multipliers cancel and verified the $120 → $150 → $120 path.

Response time: 17.89 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
Steps
- Let cost = C. Marked price = 1.25C.
- Sale price = 0.80 �? 1.25C = 1.00C.
- Paid price = 120 �?? C = 120.
- Net change = (120 �?? 120)/120 = 0.

Final answer
Original cost = $120; net change from cost to paid price = 0% (no change).

Verification
120 �?? marked up 25% �?? 150 �?? 20% off �?? 150 �?? 30 = 120 �??. Note the multipliers: 1.25 �? 0.80 = 1 exactly, so the markup and discount cancel regardless of cost. (Result is before tax, as stated.)
Test 3: Multi-Step Percentage Reasoning
Modelo: Gemini 3.6 Flash · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Arithmetic · sequential percentages · verification

Entrada

Q3 — Multi-step reasoning: A store marks an item up by 25% from its cost, then gives a 20% discount on the marked price. The customer pays $120 before tax. Find the original cost and the net percentage change from cost to the paid price.

Expected answer / scoring key

Original cost $120; net change 0%. Must multiply 1.25×0.80 rather than subtract percentage points.

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models correctly recognized that the sequential multipliers cancel and verified the $120 → $150 → $120 path.

Response time: 17.45 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
Steps:
1. Let $C > 0$ be the original cost in dollars.
2. Markup of 25%: Marked price $M = C \times (1 + 0.25) = 1.25C$.
3. Discount of 20% on marked price: Paid price $P = M \times (1 - 0.20) = 1.25C \times 0.80 = 1.00C$.
4. Set $P = \$120$:
   $$1.00C = 120 \implies C = \$120$$
5. Net percentage change from cost to paid price:
   $$\text{Net Change \%} = \frac{P - C}{C} \times 100\% = \frac{120 - 120}{120} \times 100\% = 0\%$$

Final answer:
Original cost: $\$120$; Net percentage change: $0\%$.

Verification:
Markup: $\$120 \times 1.25 = \$150$. Discount: $\$150 \times 0.80 = \$120$. Paid price matches $\$120$, and cost equals paid price ($0\%$ net change).

Group takeaway: All three models correctly recognized that the sequential multipliers cancel and verified the $120 → $150 → $120 path.

Test 4: Extraneous-Root Verification Trap

Math ability: Conditions · candidate checking · logical validity

Test 4: Extraneous-Root Verification Trap
Modelo: GPT-5.6 Sol · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Conditions · candidate checking · logical validity

Entrada

Q4 — Verification trap: Solve sqrt(x + 6) = x over the real numbers. Check every candidate in the original equation and explain why any rejected candidate fails.

Expected answer / scoring key

x=3 only. Must identify x≥0, test x=3 and x=−2 in the original equation, and reject −2 as extraneous.

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models stated the nonnegative restriction, checked both candidates, and rejected −2 in the original equation. This supports the reliability conclusion.

Response time: 32.85 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
### Steps

Solve
\[
\sqrt{x+6}=x
\]
over the real numbers.

Because a square root is nonnegative, the right-hand side must satisfy
\[
x\ge 0.
\]
Also, the radicand requires \(x+6\ge 0\), which is automatically satisfied when \(x\ge 0\).

Square both sides:
\[
x+6=x^2.
\]

Rearrange:
\[
x^2-x-6=0.
\]

Factor:
\[
(x-3)(x+2)=0.
\]

The candidates are
\[
x=3\quad\text{or}\quad x=-2.
\]

Both candidates must be checked in the original equation because squaring can introduce extraneous solutions.

For \(x=3\):
\[
\sqrt{3+6}=\sqrt9=3,
\]
so \(x=3\) is valid.

For \(x=-2\):
\[
\sqrt{-2+6}=\sqrt4=2\ne -2,
\]
so \(x=-2\) is invalid. It fails because the principal square root is always nonnegative, while the proposed right-hand side is negative.

### Final answer

\[
\boxed{x=3}
\]

### Verification

Substitution into the original equation gives
\[
\sqrt{3+6}=3,
\]
\[
3=3.
\]

The rejected candidate \(x=-2\) gives \(2=-2\), which is false.
Test 4: Extraneous-Root Verification Trap
Modelo: Claude Opus 5 · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Conditions · candidate checking · logical validity

Entrada

Q4 — Verification trap: Solve sqrt(x + 6) = x over the real numbers. Check every candidate in the original equation and explain why any rejected candidate fails.

Expected answer / scoring key

x=3 only. Must identify x≥0, test x=3 and x=−2 in the original equation, and reject −2 as extraneous.

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models stated the nonnegative restriction, checked both candidates, and rejected −2 in the original equation. This supports the reliability conclusion.

Response time: 17.89 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
Steps
- Domain/conditions: need x + 6 �?� 0 (x �?� �??6) and, since the principal square root is nonnegative, x �?� 0.
- Square both sides: x + 6 = x² �?? x² �?? x �?? 6 = 0 �?? (x �?? 3)(x + 2) = 0 �?? x = 3 or x = �??2.
- Test in the original equation: x = 3 �?? �??9 = 3 �??. x = �??2 �?? �??4 = 2 �?� �??2 �??.

Final answer
x = 3.

Verification
�??(3 + 6) = �??9 = 3 = x �??.
Why �??2 fails: squaring is not reversible �?? it turns �??(x+6) = x into an equation also satisfied by �??(x+6) = �??x. x = �??2 satisfies that second branch, but it violates the condition x �?� 0 because the principal root cannot be negative. It is an extraneous root introduced by squaring.
Test 4: Extraneous-Root Verification Trap
Modelo: Gemini 3.6 Flash · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Conditions · candidate checking · logical validity

Entrada

Q4 — Verification trap: Solve sqrt(x + 6) = x over the real numbers. Check every candidate in the original equation and explain why any rejected candidate fails.

Expected answer / scoring key

x=3 only. Must identify x≥0, test x=3 and x=−2 in the original equation, and reject −2 as extraneous.

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models stated the nonnegative restriction, checked both candidates, and rejected −2 in the original equation. This supports the reliability conclusion.

Response time: 17.45 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
Steps:
1. Equation: $\sqrt{x + 6} = x$.
2. Domain/Condition Restrictions:
   - Radicand non-negative: $x + 6 \ge 0 \implies x \ge -6$.
   - Principal square root non-negative: $\sqrt{x + 6} \ge 0 \implies x \ge 0$.
   - Combined domain restriction: $x \ge 0$.
3. Square both sides:
   $$x + 6 = x^2 \implies x^2 - x - 6 = 0$$
4. Factor:
   $$(x - 3)(x + 2) = 0 \implies \text{Candidates: } x = 3, x = -2$$
5. Check candidates in original equation $\sqrt{x + 6} = x$:
   - For $x = 3$: $\sqrt{3 + 6} = \sqrt{9} = 3$. Valid (LHS = RHS).
   - For $x = -2$: $\sqrt{-2 + 6} = \sqrt{4} = 2 \neq -2$. Rejected.
6. **Reason for rejection:** The principal real square root function $\sqrt{\cdot}$ always yields a non-negative real value ($\sqrt{4} = +2$). Since the right side is $-2$, the equation $2 = -2$ is false. $x = -2$ is an extraneous solution introduced by squaring.

Final answer:
$x = 3$.

Verification:
LHS at $x = 3$: $\sqrt{3 + 6} = \sqrt{9} = 3 = \text{RHS}$.
LHS at $x = -2$: $\sqrt{-2 + 6} = \sqrt{4} = 2 \neq -2 = \text{RHS}$.

Group takeaway: All three models stated the nonnegative restriction, checked both candidates, and rejected −2 in the original equation. This supports the reliability conclusion.

Test 5: Calculus with Differentiation Check

Math ability: Calculus · substitution · reverse verification

Test 5: Calculus with Differentiation Check
Modelo: GPT-5.6 Sol · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Calculus · substitution · reverse verification

Entrada

Q5 — Calculus: Evaluate the indefinite integral ∫ 2x*e^(x^2) dx. Name the substitution and verify by differentiation.

Expected answer / scoring key

e^(x²)+C using u=x². Must differentiate the result back to 2x·e^(x²).

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models named u=x², integrated e^u, restored x², and differentiated the result back to the original integrand.

Response time: 32.85 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
### Steps

Evaluate
\[
\int 2x e^{x^2}\,dx.
\]

Use \(u\)-substitution:
\[
u=x^2.
\]

Then
\[
du=2x\,dx.
\]

Therefore,
\[
\int 2x e^{x^2}\,dx=\int e^u\,du.
\]

Integrating:
\[
\int e^u\,du=e^u+C.
\]

Substitute \(u=x^2\):
\[
e^{x^2}+C.
\]

This antiderivative is valid for all real \(x\).

### Final answer

\[
\boxed{\int 2x e^{x^2}\,dx=e^{x^2}+C}
\]

### Verification

Differentiate the result using the chain rule:
\[
\frac{d}{dx}\left(e^{x^2}+C\right)
=e^{x^2}\cdot 2x
=2x e^{x^2}.
\]

This matches the original integrand.
Test 5: Calculus with Differentiation Check
Modelo: Claude Opus 5 · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Calculus · substitution · reverse verification

Entrada

Q5 — Calculus: Evaluate the indefinite integral ∫ 2x*e^(x^2) dx. Name the substitution and verify by differentiation.

Expected answer / scoring key

e^(x²)+C using u=x². Must differentiate the result back to 2x·e^(x²).

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models named u=x², integrated e^u, restored x², and differentiated the result back to the original integrand.

Response time: 17.89 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
Steps
- Substitution: u = x², du = 2x dx.
- �?� 2x e^(x²) dx = �?� e^u du = e^u + C = e^(x²) + C.

Final answer
e^(x²) + C.

Verification
d/dx [e^(x²) + C] = e^(x²) · d/dx(x²) = 2x e^(x²) �?? (chain rule). Valid for all real x; the integrand is continuous on �?�.
Test 5: Calculus with Differentiation Check
Modelo: Gemini 3.6 Flash · Test date: July 28, 2026
PASS · 20/20

Math ability: Calculus · substitution · reverse verification

Entrada

Q5 — Calculus: Evaluate the indefinite integral ∫ 2x*e^(x^2) dx. Name the substitution and verify by differentiation.

Expected answer / scoring key

e^(x²)+C using u=x². Must differentiate the result back to 2x·e^(x²).

Result and score

Pass · 20/20

  • Correctness: 10/10
  • Step quality: 4/4
  • Instruction following: 3/3
  • Verification/conditions: 3/3

O que aconteceu: All three models named u=x², integrated e^u, restored x², and differentiated the result back to the original integrand.

Response time: 17.45 seconds for the full five-question request.

Real model output: Full response for this test item, not an edited excerpt.

▶ Show full model output− Hide model output
Steps:
1. Evaluate $\int 2x e^{x^2} \, dx$ over domain $x \in (-\infty, \infty)$.
2. Name of substitution: $u$-substitution with $u = x^2$.
3. Compute differential: $du = 2x \, dx$.
4. Substitute into integral:
   $$\int 2x e^{x^2} \, dx = \int e^u \, du = e^u + C$$
5. Back-substitute $u = x^2$:
   $$e^{x^2} + C$$

Final answer:
$e^{x^2} + C$  (Substitution: $u = x^2$)

Verification:
Differentiate the result with respect to $x$ using the chain rule:
$$\frac{d}{dx}\left(e^{x^2} + C\right) = e^{x^2} \cdot \frac{d}{dx}(x^2) + 0 = 2x e^{x^2}$$
This recovers the original integrand.

Group takeaway: All three models named u=x², integrated e^u, restored x², and differentiated the result back to the original integrand.

The cards show why method checks matter even when every final answer is correct. The companion review of what ChatGPT gets right and wrong in math explains where answer-only evaluation can miss a weak process.

The extraneous-root test is one example of a broader failure pattern. See why ChatGPT can fail at math for more cases where conditions and verification change the result.

Which AI Math Solver Should You Choose?

Choose GPT-5.6 Sol for highly structured worked solutions

GPT-5.6 Sol gave the longest and most explicitly segmented answer in this run. It is a good fit when you want every transformation, condition, and verification written out. It was the slowest of the three in this single request, so speed-sensitive users should test it on their own workload.

Choose Claude Opus 5 for concise but rigorous explanations

Claude Opus 5 reached every correct answer with compact reasoning and strong condition checks. Its API response was close to Gemini’s latency in this run. A capture-encoding artifact affected a few mathematical symbols in the saved raw response; the underlying steps and answers remained clear and correct.

Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash for fast, complete responses

Gemini 3.6 Flash was the fastest model in this one-run comparison and still included all required verification. That makes it a practical first choice for quick checks, but the 0.44-second lead over Claude is too small to treat as a permanent speed advantage.

For an OpenAI-specific decision, see which ChatGPT model is best for math. For study workflows, the ChatGPT homework workflow shows how to ask for explanations instead of answer-only output.

A Simpler Way to Solve and Check Math in GlobalGPT

If you want a focused interface instead of building API requests, the Resolvedor matemático GlobalGPT AI lets you type a problem or upload an image and request a step-by-step explanation in one place. Use it to get a worked solution, then ask for a verification step before relying on the answer.

Try the GlobalGPT AI Math Solver

Enter or upload a math problem, review the steps, and ask the solver to check the result.

Open AI Math Solver

How to Get Better Results from Any AI Math Solver

Obter os melhores resultados de um solucionador matemático de IA depende de como você faz a pergunta. Um prompt claro pode fazer a diferença entre uma resposta fraca e uma solução passo a passo útil.

  • Para resolver: “Solve this step by step and explain each transformation.”
  • Para verificar o trabalho: “Find my first incorrect step and explain why it fails.”
  • For conditions: “State the domain and test every candidate in the original equation.”
  • For calculus: “Name the substitution and verify the antiderivative by differentiation.”
  • Para problemas com palavras: “Define variables and write the equations before solving.”

Before trusting a difficult answer, compare the final result with the assumptions and verification—not just another model’s final number. The accuracy review of ChatGPT for math offers more practical checking criteria.

Perguntas frequentes

What is the best AI math solver in this test?

GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5, and Gemini 3.6 Flash tied at 5/5 on the July 28, 2026 test. Gemini returned fastest in the single run, but the sample is too small to declare a universal accuracy or speed winner.

Which model was fastest?

Gemini 3.6 Flash returned in 17.45 seconds, Claude Opus 5 in 17.89 seconds, and GPT-5.6 Sol in 32.85 seconds. These are one-run API measurements, not long-term latency benchmarks.

A IA consegue resolver problemas de palavras com precisão?

Yes, but ask the model to define variables, form equations, and verify the result. All three tested models solved the geometry and percentage word problems correctly in this test.

Can an AI math solver keep an invalid answer?

Yes. Squaring equations and dividing by variable expressions can introduce or hide invalid cases. Ask the solver to state conditions and test every candidate in the original problem.

A IA pode ler problemas de matemática escritos à mão?

Multimodal math tools can accept image input, but handwriting recognition was not tested through the text-only API run described here. The GlobalGPT Math Solver page supports uploading a math-problem image for step-by-step help.

Can I use GlobalGPT for math problems?

Yes. The GlobalGPT AI Math Solver provides a focused place to type or upload a problem and receive a step-by-step explanation. You should still review the conditions and request a verification step.

Was this a paid, reproducible test?

The test used an authorized API connection on July 28, 2026 and consumed a reasonable amount of API usage. Each model received the same five questions and instructions in one request; no model-specific sampling settings were supplied.

Compartilhe a postagem:

Publicações relacionadas