MiniMax M3.1 フラッシュガイド:API、価格、ベンチマーク、パラメータ、および無料アクセス

簡単な回答

A fast, low-cost model for long-context agent work

MiniMax M3.1 Flash launched on October 19, 2026 with a 1M-token context window, adjustable thinking effort, multimodal input, and tool support. We tested three real tasks—exact JSON, JavaScript debugging, and HTTP 503 diagnosis—and all three completed successfully.

文脈
1M
トークン
投入価格
$0.15
100万トークンあたり
Real tasks
3/3
完了

If you are comparing low-cost agent models for coding, tool use, or long documents, this guide puts the useful facts in one place: what the model can do, what the official scores actually mean, how to call it, how to estimate cost, and where access is currently visible. You can also compare the broader コーディングに最適なAIモデル list before choosing a default.

Try MiniMax M3.1 Flash on GlobalGPT through the general model workspace. The authenticated test route used for this article exposed the model as “MiniMax M3.1 Flash”; platform entitlements and model availability can change by account and region.

What is MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is the company’s fast agent-oriented model for coding, computer-use workflows, tool calling, cybersecurity tasks, and long-context reasoning. The 発売のお知らせ dates the release to October 19, 2026, while the official invocation guide lists a 1M-token context window.

The word “Flash” describes the model’s speed and cost position, not a separate lightweight chat-only mode. Thinking is enabled by default and cannot be switched off in the documented API behavior. You can select a thinking effort level, which gives you a practical trade-off between response depth, latency, and output cost.

That makes the model interesting for repository tasks, structured planning, API troubleshooting, and agents that need to keep a large amount of context in one turn. It is still worth matching the model to the workload: for a useful model-selection framework, see this AIモデルの選び方ガイド and compare the specific tool or coding constraints you have.

Official benchmarks and speed claims

The launch article publishes the following scores and positioning. They are MiniMax-reported figures, not independent reruns from this article. The right way to read them is as the provider’s release evidence and task coverage, not as a promise that every prompt will match a leaderboard result.

MiniMax-reported Launch article checked October 26, 2026
Evaluation or claimPublished resultその解釈方法
BankerToolBench76.2Tool-oriented work, reported by MiniMax
DeepSWE v1.173.7%Software-engineering benchmark context
OSWorld V261.7Computer-use task performance context
Agents’ Last Exam29.6Agent evaluation context
サイバージム82%Cybersecurity task context
出力速度200+ TPS peak; 170+ TPS P50Provider-reported throughput claim, not our latency test
MiniMax M3.1 Flash MiniMax-reported benchmark snapshot
MiniMax-reported benchmark snapshot; this article does not present it as an independent rerun.

These numbers do not tell you the price of one repository fix, the latency of your region, or how well the model follows your tools. For those decisions, use a small controlled evaluation with your own prompts, tool schema, context length, and retry policy.

API pricing and cost examples

MiniMax’s pricing overview lists USD token rates for the direct API. The billing unit is one million tokens, and cached input is priced separately from uncached input. These rates describe the MiniMax API route; they are not a conversion of GlobalGPT credits or a third-party plan.

インプット
$0.15
100万トークンあたり
出力
$0.60
100万トークンあたり
キャッシュされた入力
$0.015
100万トークンあたり
シナリオ計算API利用料の見積もり
100k input + 20k output(0.1 × $0.15) + (0.02 × $0.60)$0.027
100k cached input + 20k output(0.1 × $0.015) + (0.02 × $0.60)$0.0135
1M input + 200k output(1 × $0.15) + (0.2 × $0.60)$0.27

These are arithmetic examples before taxes, account-level discounts, retries, tool-side charges, or any platform markup. The cheapest path is usually to reuse stable prefixes as cacheable input and keep the output budget appropriate to the task instead of paying for a large completion every time.

If you are comparing direct API pricing with hosted subscriptions, keep the units separate. The ClaudeのプランおよびAPI料金ガイド is a useful example of why consumer plans, API tokens, and platform credits should not be treated as the same currency.

API setup: OpenAI-compatible and Anthropic-compatible

MiniMax documents two compatibility layers in its OpenAI-compatible reference そして Anthropic-compatible reference. The OpenAI-compatible route is convenient if your application already uses the OpenAI SDK. The Anthropic-compatible route uses Anthropic message semantics. In both cases the documented model ID is MiniMax-M3.1-Flash; keep the spelling and capitalization exactly as shown by the target endpoint.

OpenAI-compatible example

記事を共有する

関連記事