{"id":17206,"date":"2026-07-27T10:01:11","date_gmt":"2026-07-27T14:01:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/?p=17206"},"modified":"2026-07-27T10:01:13","modified_gmt":"2026-07-27T14:01:13","slug":"claude-opus-5-vs-fable-5-vs-sonnet-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/hub\/zh\/claude-opus-5-vs-fable-5-vs-sonnet-5","title":{"rendered":"Claude Opus 5 vs Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5: Which Claude Model Is Best?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"lede wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Opus 5 is the best default for high-value professional work, Fable 5 is the strongest choice when maximum capability matters more than price, and Sonnet 5 is the best value for fast, clearly scoped tasks.<\/strong>\u00a0Our 15-call API test reinforced that split: no model won every workflow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<style>.verdict-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(3,1fr);gap:12px;margin:24px 0}.verdict-grid .verdict{padding:18px;border:1px solid #dfe3eb;border-radius:8px}.verdict-grid .verdict strong{display:block;font-size:1.05rem}.verdict-grid .tag{display:inline-block;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:99px;background:#eee9ff;color:#452cb7;font-size:.76rem;font-weight:700}@media(max-width:700px){.verdict-grid{grid-template-columns:1fr}}<\/style>\n<div class=\"verdict-grid\">\n  <div class=\"verdict\"><span class=\"tag\">BEST OVERALL<\/span><strong>Claude Opus 5<\/strong><span>Deep analysis and strong editorial judgment at half Fable\u2019s API price.<\/span><\/div>\n  <div class=\"verdict\"><span class=\"tag\">HIGHEST CEILING<\/span><strong>\u514b\u52b3\u5fb7\u00b7\u6cd5\u5e03\u5c14 5<\/strong><span>Best completion in our planning and contract-analysis tests.<\/span><\/div>\n  <div class=\"verdict\"><span class=\"tag\">BEST VALUE<\/span><strong>\u514b\u52b3\u5fb7\u00b7\u6851\u5185\u7279 5<\/strong><span>Fastest average response and the cleanest coding result in our test.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That answer changes with the job. Fable can justify its premium on difficult autonomous work. Opus offers a more practical balance for advanced everyday use. Sonnet is easier to scale when latency and cost dominate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">You do not necessarily have to commit to one model.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.glbgpt.com\/home?inviter=hub_content_home&amp;login=1\"><strong>GlobalGPT<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0\u5305\u62ec <a href=\"https:\/\/www.glbgpt.com\/home\/claude-opus-5?inviter=hub_claude5&amp;login=1\">Claude Opus 5<\/a>, Fable 5, and Sonnet 5 in its Basic plan, so you can use Sonnet for fast execution, switch to Opus for deeper review, and bring in Fable for the hardest planning tasks\u2014all within the same multi-model workspace.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.glbgpt.com\/home\/claude-opus-5?inviter=hub_claude5&amp;login=1\"><img alt=\"\" fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"973\" height=\"619\" src=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-opus-5-1.webp\" class=\"wp-image-17213\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-opus-5-1.webp 973w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-opus-5-1-300x191.webp 300w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-opus-5-1-768x489.webp 768w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-opus-5-1-18x12.webp 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 973px) 100vw, 973px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-3e41869c wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link has-black-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-background-color has-text-color has-background has-link-color wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/www.glbgpt.com\/home\/claude-opus-5?inviter=hub_claude5&amp;login=1\">Try Claude Opus 5<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<style>.toc{padding:20px 24px;background:#f7f8fb;border-left:4px solid #6545e8}.toc ul{columns:2}.toc a{color:#5136d9}@media(max-width:700px){.toc ul{columns:1}}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc\" aria-label=\"\u76ee\u5f55\"><strong>\u76ee\u5f55<\/strong><ul>\n<li><a href=\"#quick-comparison\">\u5feb\u901f\u5bf9\u6bd4<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#key-differences\">\u4e3b\u8981\u533a\u522b<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#opus-5-vs-opus-4-8\">Opus 5 vs Opus 4.8<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#benchmarks\">Benchmarks<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#pricing\">\u5b9a\u4ef7<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#api-test\">Hands-on API test<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#coding-agents\">Coding and agents<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#user-reports\">Reddit and X reports<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#which-model\">\u60a8\u5e94\u8be5\u9009\u62e9\u54ea\u4e00\u6b3e\uff1f<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#globalgpt\">Using all three in GlobalGPT<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#faq\">\u5e38\u89c1\u95ee\u9898<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#final-verdict\">\u6700\u7ec8\u5224\u51b3<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/nav>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"quick-comparison\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Claude Opus 5 vs Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5: Quick Comparison<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>\u6a21\u578b<\/th><th>\u6700\u9002\u5408<\/th><th>Input \/ output per 1M tokens<\/th><th>\u80cc\u666f<\/th><th>Relative speed<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/strong><\/td><td>Hard autonomous work, ambiguous planning, maximum capability<\/td><td>$10 \/ $50<\/td><td>1M<\/td><td>\u8f83\u6162<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Opus 5<\/strong><\/td><td>Advanced coding, analysis, enterprise knowledge work<\/td><td>$5 \/ $25<\/td><td>1M<\/td><td>\u4e2d\u5ea6<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/strong><\/td><td>High-volume coding, tool use, fast production tasks<\/td><td>$2 \/ $10 introductory; $3 \/ $15 from Sep. 1, 2026<\/td><td>1M<\/td><td>\u5feb\u901f<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">All three support a 1-million-token context window and a standard maximum output of 128K tokens. The meaningful differences are how much reasoning you need, how quickly you need it, and how much each completed task costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1280\" height=\"799\" src=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-5-official-model-comparison.webp\" alt=\"Claude Fable 5 vs Opus 5 vs Sonnet 5 model comparison\" class=\"wp-image-17224\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-5-official-model-comparison.webp 1280w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-5-official-model-comparison-300x187.webp 300w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-5-official-model-comparison-1024x639.webp 1024w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-5-official-model-comparison-768x479.webp 768w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-5-official-model-comparison-18x12.webp 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Anthropic\u2019s model table compares pricing, latency, context windows, and output limits.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"key-differences\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key Differences Between Fable 5, Opus 5, and Sonnet 5<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Fable 5 prioritizes the capability ceiling<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Choose Fable when the prompt is underspecified, the plan spans many dependent steps, or a mistake is more expensive than extra inference cost. In our test it was the only model to finish both the full ten-step agent plan and every requested part of the contract analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Opus 5 is the practical premium model<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Opus is designed to approach Fable-level intelligence at half its token price. It tends to inspect more edge cases and impose stronger editorial guardrails, but that depth can become verbosity. Four of its five tested answers reached our 1,800-token ceiling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Sonnet 5 turns clarity into speed<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sonnet works best when the acceptance criteria are explicit. It delivered the fastest average response and the most usable first-pass coding answer. The trade-off is less headroom when a task requires extended planning or broad judgment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"opus-5-vs-opus-4-8\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Opus 5 vs Opus 4.8: What Changed?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Opus 5 keeps the same standard API rate as Opus 4.8 while pushing further into agentic coding, computer use, and professional knowledge work. Anthropic\u2019s launch claims include a greater than twofold improvement on Frontier-Bench v0.1 and stronger cost efficiency on OSWorld 2.0 and Zapier AutomationBench.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Upgrade for:<\/strong> difficult coding agents, tool-rich workflows, research synthesis, and self-verifying work.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Keep Opus 4.8 when:<\/strong> an existing production workflow is stable and the migration benefit has not been measured.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Test before switching:<\/strong> Opus 5 can spend more tokens exploring edge cases, so quality gains do not automatically reduce total cost.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1280\" height=\"1161\" src=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-opus-5-official-launch.webp\" alt=\"Anthropic Claude Opus 5 launch announcement\" class=\"wp-image-17221\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-opus-5-official-launch.webp 1280w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-opus-5-official-launch-300x272.webp 300w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-opus-5-official-launch-1024x929.webp 1024w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-opus-5-official-launch-768x697.webp 768w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-opus-5-official-launch-13x12.webp 13w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Anthropic positions Opus 5 near Fable 5\u2019s frontier intelligence at half the API price.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"benchmarks\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Opus 5 vs Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 Benchmarks<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Artificial Analysis scored Opus 5 at 61 and Fable 5 at 60 on its Intelligence Index. A one-point difference is better read as a near tie than proof that Opus is universally smarter. Sonnet 5 scored 53, leaving a clearer capability gap on the composite test.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<style>.bars{padding:20px;border:1px solid #dfe3eb;border-radius:8px;margin:24px 0}.bars .bar-row{display:grid;grid-template-columns:150px 1fr 72px;gap:12px;align-items:center;margin:12px 0}.bars .track{height:18px;background:#edf0f5;border-radius:4px;overflow:hidden}.bars .fill{height:100%;background:#6545e8}.bars .fill.alt{background:#b76b36}.bars .fill.fast{background:#258c72}@media(max-width:700px){.bars .bar-row{grid-template-columns:110px 1fr 58px}}<\/style>\n<div class=\"bars\" aria-label=\"\u4eba\u5de5\u667a\u80fd\u5206\u6790\u6307\u6570\"><strong>\u4eba\u5de5\u667a\u80fd\u5206\u6790\u6307\u6570<\/strong>\n<div class=\"bar-row\"><span>Opus 5<\/span><div class=\"track\"><div class=\"fill\" style=\"width:100%\"><\/div><\/div><b>61<\/b><\/div>\n<div class=\"bar-row\"><span>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/span><div class=\"track\"><div class=\"fill alt\" style=\"width:98.4%\"><\/div><\/div><b>60<\/b><\/div>\n<div class=\"bar-row\"><span>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/span><div class=\"track\"><div class=\"fill fast\" style=\"width:86.9%\"><\/div><\/div><b>53<\/b><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On professional-agent evaluations reported on the same Opus 5 analysis page, Opus reached 1,861 Elo on GDPval-AA v2 and 1,720 Elo on AA-Briefcase. Fable recorded 1,747 and 1,574 respectively; Sonnet\u2019s listed AA-Briefcase result was 1,391. These tests favor particular agent configurations, so they are inputs to a decision\u2014not a universal ranking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1280\" height=\"1276\" src=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-artificial-analysis-benchmarks.webp\" alt=\"Claude Opus 5 Artificial Analysis benchmark results\" class=\"wp-image-17226\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-artificial-analysis-benchmarks.webp 1280w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-artificial-analysis-benchmarks-300x300.webp 300w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-artificial-analysis-benchmarks-1024x1021.webp 1024w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-artificial-analysis-benchmarks-150x150.webp 150w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-artificial-analysis-benchmarks-768x766.webp 768w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-artificial-analysis-benchmarks-12x12.webp 12w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Artificial Analysis reported Opus 5 at 61 on its Intelligence Index, effectively tied with Fable 5 at 60.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"pricing\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Opus 5 vs Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 Pricing<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>\u6a21\u578b<\/th><th>\u8f93\u5165 \/ 1M<\/th><th>\u8f93\u51fa \/ 1M<\/th><th>1M input + 200K output<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/td><td>$10<\/td><td>$50<\/td><td><strong>$20<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Opus 5<\/td><td>$5<\/td><td>$25<\/td><td><strong>$10<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Sonnet 5 introductory<\/td><td>$2<\/td><td>$10<\/td><td><strong>$4<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Sonnet 5 from Sep. 1, 2026<\/td><td>$3<\/td><td>$15<\/td><td><strong>$6<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fable costs twice as much as Opus at the same token volume, while Sonnet costs 60% less than Opus during its introductory period. Real cost still depends on output length, retries, effort settings, caching, batch discounts, and whether the first answer is usable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1280\" height=\"1199\" src=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-5-official-api-pricing.webp\" alt=\"Claude Fable 5 Opus 5 and Sonnet 5 API pricing\" class=\"wp-image-17227\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-5-official-api-pricing.webp 1280w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-5-official-api-pricing-300x281.webp 300w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-5-official-api-pricing-1024x959.webp 1024w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-5-official-api-pricing-768x719.webp 768w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/claude-5-official-api-pricing-13x12.webp 13w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Anthropic lists Fable 5 at $10\/$50, Opus 5 at $5\/$25, and Sonnet 5 introductory pricing at $2\/$10 per million input\/output tokens.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<style>.price-note{padding:16px 18px;background:#fff8e7;border:1px solid #f0d58b;border-radius:6px}<\/style>\n<div class=\"note price-note\"><strong>Pricing shortcut:<\/strong> use Sonnet for repeatable high-volume work, Opus for expensive-to-review professional work, and Fable only where its extra planning or completion quality can repay the premium.<\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"api-test\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Our Hands-On API Test: 15 Calls Across Five Workflows<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<style>\n.claude-radar-card,.claude-radar-card *{box-sizing:border-box}.claude-radar-card{width:100%;overflow:hidden;border:1px solid #dce2e9;border-radius:8px;background:#fff;color:#1b2028;font-family:Inter,-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,\"Segoe UI\",sans-serif}.claude-radar-card__head{display:flex;align-items:flex-start;justify-content:space-between;gap:16px;padding:14px 16px;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9;background:#f4f6f8}.claude-radar-card__head span{display:block;color:#7a5100;font-size:10px;font-weight:800;text-transform:uppercase}.claude-radar-card__head h3{margin:3px 0 0;font-size:18px;line-height:1.35}.claude-radar-card__head strong{flex:0 0 auto;padding:5px 8px;border-radius:8px;background:#fff4d6;color:#7a5100;font-size:11px}.claude-radar-card__body{display:grid;grid-template-columns:minmax(360px,1.1fr) minmax(300px,.9fr);gap:18px;padding:16px}.claude-radar-card__chart{min-width:0;border-right:1px solid #dce2e9;padding-right:18px}.claude-radar-card__chart-title{margin:0 0 8px;color:#48515e;font-size:12px;font-weight:800}.claude-radar-card__chart svg{display:block;width:100%;height:auto;max-height:360px}.claude-radar-card__legend{display:flex;justify-content:center;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:14px;margin-top:4px;color:#48515e;font-size:11px}.claude-radar-card__legend span{display:flex;align-items:center;gap:5px}.claude-radar-card__swatch{width:10px;height:10px;border-radius:2px}.claude-radar-card__results{display:flex;flex-direction:column;gap:0}.claude-radar-card__result{display:grid;grid-template-columns:96px 1fr;gap:10px;padding:10px 0;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9}.claude-radar-card__result:first-child{padding-top:0}.claude-radar-card__result:last-child{border-bottom:0}.claude-radar-card__result span{color:#606a78;font-size:10px;font-weight:800;text-transform:uppercase}.claude-radar-card__result strong{font-size:13px}.claude-radar-card__result p{grid-column:2;margin:2px 0 0;color:#48515e;font-size:12px;line-height:1.5}.claude-radar-card__note{margin:0;padding:11px 16px;border-top:1px solid #dce2e9;background:#f8f9fb;color:#606a78;font-size:12px;line-height:1.55}.claude-radar-card__scale{margin:8px 0 0;color:#606a78;font-size:10px;line-height:1.45}@media(max-width:780px){.claude-radar-card__body{grid-template-columns:1fr}.claude-radar-card__chart{border-right:0;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9;padding:0 0 16px}.claude-radar-card__result{grid-template-columns:88px 1fr}}@media(max-width:440px){.claude-radar-card__head{display:block}.claude-radar-card__head strong{display:inline-block;margin-top:8px}.claude-radar-card__body{padding:12px}}\n<\/style>\n\n<section class=\"claude-radar-card\" data-model-test-module=\"radar-summary\">\n  <header class=\"claude-radar-card__head\">\n    <div><span>FIVE-TASK FIRST-OUTPUT TEST<\/span><h3>Where Each Claude Model Performed Best<\/h3><\/div>\n    <strong>15 \/ 15 CALLS SUCCEEDED<\/strong>\n  <\/header>\n  <div class=\"claude-radar-card__body\">\n    <div class=\"claude-radar-card__chart\">\n      <p class=\"claude-radar-card__chart-title\">Task performance in our API test \u00b7 1\u20135 scale<\/p>\n      <svg viewbox=\"0 0 340 310\" role=\"img\" aria-labelledby=\"claude-radar-title claude-radar-desc\">\n        <title id=\"claude-radar-title\">Claude Opus 5, Fable 5, and Sonnet 5 performance across five tested workflows<\/title>\n        <desc id=\"claude-radar-desc\">Sonnet led coding, Fable led planning and contract analysis, Opus led SEO editorial judgment, and all three struggled with strict JSON output.<\/desc>\n        <g fill=\"none\" stroke=\"#dce2e9\" stroke-width=\"1\">\n          <polygon points=\"170,128 191,143 183,168 157,168 149,143\"\/>\n          <polygon points=\"170,106 212,133 196,186 144,186 128,133\"\/>\n          <polygon points=\"170,84 233,126 209,204 131,204 107,126\"\/>\n          <polygon points=\"170,62 254,119 222,222 118,222 86,119\"\/>\n          <polygon points=\"170,40 275,116 235,239 105,239 65,116\"\/>\n          <line x1=\"170\" y1=\"150\" x2=\"170\" y2=\"40\"\/><line x1=\"170\" y1=\"150\" x2=\"275\" y2=\"116\"\/><line x1=\"170\" y1=\"150\" x2=\"235\" y2=\"239\"\/><line x1=\"170\" y1=\"150\" x2=\"105\" y2=\"239\"\/><line x1=\"170\" y1=\"150\" x2=\"65\" y2=\"116\"\/>\n        <\/g>\n        <g fill=\"#606a78\" font-family=\"Inter,Arial,sans-serif\" font-size=\"11\" font-weight=\"700\">\n          <text x=\"170\" y=\"22\" text-anchor=\"middle\">\u7f16\u7801<\/text>\n          <text x=\"286\" y=\"111\" text-anchor=\"start\">\u89c4\u5212<\/text>\n          <text x=\"244\" y=\"260\" text-anchor=\"middle\">Contract<\/text>\n          <text x=\"96\" y=\"260\" text-anchor=\"middle\">JSON<\/text>\n          <text x=\"54\" y=\"111\" text-anchor=\"end\">\u641c\u7d22\u5f15\u64ce\u4f18\u5316<\/text>\n        <\/g>\n        <polygon points=\"170,106 254,123 209,203 144,186 86,123\" fill=\"#5b4cc4\" fill-opacity=\".12\" stroke=\"#5b4cc4\" stroke-width=\"2\"\/>\n        <polygon points=\"170,62 275,116 235,239 144,186 128,136\" fill=\"#c87932\" fill-opacity=\".11\" stroke=\"#c87932\" stroke-width=\"2\"\/>\n        <polygon points=\"170,40 233,130 196,186 144,186 128,136\" fill=\"#168a88\" fill-opacity=\".11\" stroke=\"#168a88\" stroke-width=\"2\"\/>\n        <g fill=\"#5b4cc4\"><circle cx=\"170\" cy=\"106\" r=\"3\"\/><circle cx=\"254\" cy=\"123\" r=\"3\"\/><circle cx=\"209\" cy=\"203\" r=\"3\"\/><circle cx=\"144\" cy=\"186\" r=\"3\"\/><circle cx=\"86\" cy=\"123\" r=\"3\"\/><\/g>\n        <g fill=\"#c87932\"><circle cx=\"170\" cy=\"62\" r=\"3\"\/><circle cx=\"275\" cy=\"116\" r=\"3\"\/><circle cx=\"235\" cy=\"239\" r=\"3\"\/><circle cx=\"144\" cy=\"186\" r=\"3\"\/><circle cx=\"128\" cy=\"136\" r=\"3\"\/><\/g>\n        <g fill=\"#168a88\"><circle cx=\"170\" cy=\"40\" r=\"3\"\/><circle cx=\"233\" cy=\"130\" r=\"3\"\/><circle cx=\"196\" cy=\"186\" r=\"3\"\/><circle cx=\"144\" cy=\"186\" r=\"3\"\/><circle cx=\"128\" cy=\"136\" r=\"3\"\/><\/g>\n      <\/svg>\n      <div class=\"claude-radar-card__legend\" aria-label=\"Radar chart legend\">\n        <span><i class=\"claude-radar-card__swatch\" style=\"background:#5b4cc4\"><\/i>Opus 5<\/span>\n        <span><i class=\"claude-radar-card__swatch\" style=\"background:#c87932\"><\/i>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/span>\n        <span><i class=\"claude-radar-card__swatch\" style=\"background:#168a88\"><\/i>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/span>\n      <\/div>\n      <p class=\"claude-radar-card__scale\">Scale: 5 = best complete result; 4 = strong result with a trade-off; 3 = useful but partial; 2 = missed a key requirement; 1 = unusable.<\/p>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"claude-radar-card__results\">\n      <div class=\"claude-radar-card__result\"><span>\u7f16\u7801<\/span><strong>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/strong><p>Fastest complete repair with exactly six requested tests.<\/p><\/div>\n      <div class=\"claude-radar-card__result\"><span>\u89c4\u5212<\/span><strong>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/strong><p>The only model to finish the full ten-step workflow.<\/p><\/div>\n      <div class=\"claude-radar-card__result\"><span>Contract<\/span><strong>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/strong><p>Completed every requested analysis component and reference index.<\/p><\/div>\n      <div class=\"claude-radar-card__result\"><span>\u641c\u7d22\u5f15\u64ce\u4f18\u5316<\/span><strong>Opus 5<\/strong><p>Best editorial structure and factual guardrails.<\/p><\/div>\n      <div class=\"claude-radar-card__result\"><span>Strict JSON<\/span><strong>No clean winner<\/strong><p>All three broke the JSON-only requirement; schema validation is essential.<\/p><\/div>\n    <\/div>\n  <\/div>\n  <p class=\"claude-radar-card__note\">One first output per task and model, using temperature 0 and a 1,800-token output limit. The radar summarizes these five tested workflows only; it is not a universal model benchmark.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n\n<style>\n.mt3,.mt3 *{box-sizing:border-box}.mt3{width:100%;overflow:hidden;border:1px solid #dce2e9;border-radius:8px;background:#fff;color:#1b2028;font-family:Inter,-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,\"Segoe UI\",sans-serif}.mt3__head{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;gap:18px;padding:14px 16px;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3__head span{display:block;color:#185abc;font-size:10px;font-weight:800;text-transform:uppercase}.mt3 h3{margin:3px 0 0;font-size:18px}.mt3__winner{align-self:flex-start;padding:5px 8px;border-radius:8px;background:#fff4d6;color:#7a5100;font-size:11px}.mt3__body{padding:14px 16px 16px}.mt3__answers{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(3,1fr);border:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3__answer{min-width:0;padding:14px;border-right:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3__answer:last-child{border-right:0}.mt3__model{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;gap:8px}.mt3__model strong{font-size:13px}.mt3__model span{color:#185abc;font-size:12px;font-weight:800}.mt3__answer p{margin:9px 0 0;color:#3b4552;font-size:13px;line-height:1.6}.mt3__table{overflow-x:auto}.mt3 table{width:100%;min-width:720px;margin-top:12px;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:12px}.mt3 th,.mt3 td{padding:8px 9px;border:1px solid #dce2e9;text-align:left;vertical-align:top}.mt3 th{background:#f4f6f8}.mt3__verdict{margin:12px 0 0;padding:11px 12px;border-left:4px solid #7a5100;background:#fff4d6;color:#3b4552;font-size:13px;line-height:1.6}.mt3 details{margin-top:10px;border-top:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3 summary{padding-top:9px;color:#185abc;cursor:pointer;font-size:12px;font-weight:800}.mt3__detail{margin-top:8px;padding:10px 12px;background:#f4f6f8;color:#3b4552;font-size:12px;white-space:pre-wrap}@media(max-width:760px){.mt3__answers{grid-template-columns:1fr}.mt3__answer{border-right:0;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9}}\n<\/style>\n<section class=\"mt3\" data-model-test-module=\"coding_debug\"><header class=\"mt3__head\"><div><span>CODING DEBUG<\/span><h3>Coding Debug<\/h3><\/div><strong class=\"mt3__winner\">Winner: Sonnet 5<\/strong><\/header><div class=\"mt3__body\"><div class=\"mt3__answers\"><article class=\"mt3__answer\"><div class=\"mt3__model\"><strong>Opus 5<\/strong><span>26.00s \u00b7 1,800 tokens<\/span><\/div><p>Found the broadest set of edge cases, including invalid scores and deterministic ties, but the answer ended before the corrected function appeared.<\/p><\/article><article class=\"mt3__answer\"><div class=\"mt3__model\"><strong>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/strong><span>21.15s \u00b7 1,324 tokens<\/span><\/div><p>Delivered a complete repair and the six requested tests, then added a bonus test beyond scope.<\/p><\/article><article class=\"mt3__answer\"><div class=\"mt3__model\"><strong>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/strong><span>15.97s \u00b7 1,088 tokens<\/span><\/div><p>Delivered a complete function and exactly six runnable tests while staying focused on the requested scope.<\/p><\/article><\/div><div class=\"mt3__table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Task-specific check<\/th><th>Opus 5<\/th><th>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/th><th>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><th>Complete repaired function<\/th><td>No \u2014 output capped<\/td><td>\u662f<\/td><td>\u662f<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Six requested tests<\/th><td>No \u2014 output capped<\/td><td>Yes + bonus<\/td><td>Yes, exactly six<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Input mutation handled<\/th><td>Diagnosed<\/td><td>\u56fa\u5b9a\u5f0f<\/td><td>\u56fa\u5b9a\u5f0f<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Scope control<\/th><td>Deep but incomplete<\/td><td>Slight overdelivery<\/td><td>\u6700\u4f73<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><p class=\"mt3__verdict\">Sonnet 5 produced the most usable first answer: complete, fast, and correctly scoped. Opus showed the deepest diagnosis, but depth did not help when the answer ended before the repair.<\/p><details><summary>\u67e5\u770b\u786e\u5207\u7684\u63d0\u793a\u8bed<\/summary><div class=\"mt3__detail\">Diagnose and fix the JavaScript topN function. It must not mutate input, must sort numeric scores descending, handle ties and decimal scores, return [] for negative n, and include exactly six runnable tests.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>View full-run evidence<\/summary><div class=\"mt3__detail\">First valid outputs and metadata are preserved in api-test\/results.jsonl. No retry was used to replace a valid output.<\/div><\/details><\/div><\/section>\n\n\n\n<style>\n.mt3,.mt3 *{box-sizing:border-box}.mt3{width:100%;overflow:hidden;border:1px solid #dce2e9;border-radius:8px;background:#fff;color:#1b2028;font-family:Inter,-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,\"Segoe UI\",sans-serif}.mt3__head{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;gap:18px;padding:14px 16px;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3__head span{display:block;color:#185abc;font-size:10px;font-weight:800;text-transform:uppercase}.mt3 h3{margin:3px 0 0;font-size:18px}.mt3__winner{align-self:flex-start;padding:5px 8px;border-radius:8px;background:#fff4d6;color:#7a5100;font-size:11px}.mt3__body{padding:14px 16px 16px}.mt3__answers{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(3,1fr);border:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3__answer{min-width:0;padding:14px;border-right:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3__answer:last-child{border-right:0}.mt3__model{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;gap:8px}.mt3__model strong{font-size:13px}.mt3__model span{color:#185abc;font-size:12px;font-weight:800}.mt3__answer p{margin:9px 0 0;color:#3b4552;font-size:13px;line-height:1.6}.mt3__table{overflow-x:auto}.mt3 table{width:100%;min-width:720px;margin-top:12px;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:12px}.mt3 th,.mt3 td{padding:8px 9px;border:1px solid #dce2e9;text-align:left;vertical-align:top}.mt3 th{background:#f4f6f8}.mt3__verdict{margin:12px 0 0;padding:11px 12px;border-left:4px solid #7a5100;background:#fff4d6;color:#3b4552;font-size:13px;line-height:1.6}.mt3 details{margin-top:10px;border-top:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3 summary{padding-top:9px;color:#185abc;cursor:pointer;font-size:12px;font-weight:800}.mt3__detail{margin-top:8px;padding:10px 12px;background:#f4f6f8;color:#3b4552;font-size:12px;white-space:pre-wrap}@media(max-width:760px){.mt3__answers{grid-template-columns:1fr}.mt3__answer{border-right:0;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9}}\n<\/style>\n<section class=\"mt3\" data-model-test-module=\"agent_planning\"><header class=\"mt3__head\"><div><span>AGENT PLANNING<\/span><h3>Agent Planning<\/h3><\/div><strong class=\"mt3__winner\">Winner: Fable 5<\/strong><\/header><div class=\"mt3__body\"><div class=\"mt3__answers\"><article class=\"mt3__answer\"><div class=\"mt3__model\"><strong>Opus 5<\/strong><span>29.84s \u00b7 1,800 tokens<\/span><\/div><p>Designed the most detailed governance controls, rollback triggers, and measurable checks, but stopped at the beginning of step six.<\/p><\/article><article class=\"mt3__answer\"><div class=\"mt3__model\"><strong>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/strong><span>32.90s \u00b7 1,800 tokens<\/span><\/div><p>The only model to complete the full ten-step migration table, including human gates, verification thresholds, and rollback rules.<\/p><\/article><article class=\"mt3__answer\"><div class=\"mt3__model\"><strong>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/strong><span>23.94s \u00b7 1,800 tokens<\/span><\/div><p>Reached the answer fastest and kept the plan readable, but stopped during step seven.<\/p><\/article><\/div><div class=\"mt3__table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Task-specific check<\/th><th>Opus 5<\/th><th>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/th><th>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><th>All 10 steps visible<\/th><td>\u6ca1\u6709<\/td><td>\u662f<\/td><td>\u6ca1\u6709<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Human checkpoints<\/th><td>\u5f3a\u5927<\/td><td>\u5f3a\u5927<\/td><td>\u5f3a\u5927<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Measurable verification<\/th><td>\u5f3a\u5927<\/td><td>Strong and complete<\/td><td>\u826f\u597d<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Rollback conditions<\/th><td>Strong but partial<\/td><td>\u5b8c\u6210<\/td><td>\u90e8\u5206<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><p class=\"mt3__verdict\">Fable 5 won on deliverable completion. Opus had the strongest control design, but an unfinished workflow is harder to execute. Sonnet is attractive when speed matters and a shorter plan is acceptable.<\/p><details><summary>\u67e5\u770b\u786e\u5207\u7684\u63d0\u793a\u8bed<\/summary><div class=\"mt3__detail\">Create a 10-step agent workflow for migrating a 200-article AI blog to a new CMS. Include owners, human checkpoints, measurable verification, rollback conditions, and the top three failure modes.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>View full-run evidence<\/summary><div class=\"mt3__detail\">First valid outputs and metadata are preserved in api-test\/results.jsonl. No retry was used to replace a valid output.<\/div><\/details><\/div><\/section>\n\n\n\n<style>\n.mt3,.mt3 *{box-sizing:border-box}.mt3{width:100%;overflow:hidden;border:1px solid #dce2e9;border-radius:8px;background:#fff;color:#1b2028;font-family:Inter,-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,\"Segoe UI\",sans-serif}.mt3__head{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;gap:18px;padding:14px 16px;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3__head span{display:block;color:#185abc;font-size:10px;font-weight:800;text-transform:uppercase}.mt3 h3{margin:3px 0 0;font-size:18px}.mt3__winner{align-self:flex-start;padding:5px 8px;border-radius:8px;background:#fff4d6;color:#7a5100;font-size:11px}.mt3__body{padding:14px 16px 16px}.mt3__answers{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(3,1fr);border:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3__answer{min-width:0;padding:14px;border-right:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3__answer:last-child{border-right:0}.mt3__model{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;gap:8px}.mt3__model strong{font-size:13px}.mt3__model span{color:#185abc;font-size:12px;font-weight:800}.mt3__answer p{margin:9px 0 0;color:#3b4552;font-size:13px;line-height:1.6}.mt3__table{overflow-x:auto}.mt3 table{width:100%;min-width:720px;margin-top:12px;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:12px}.mt3 th,.mt3 td{padding:8px 9px;border:1px solid #dce2e9;text-align:left;vertical-align:top}.mt3 th{background:#f4f6f8}.mt3__verdict{margin:12px 0 0;padding:11px 12px;border-left:4px solid #7a5100;background:#fff4d6;color:#3b4552;font-size:13px;line-height:1.6}.mt3 details{margin-top:10px;border-top:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3 summary{padding-top:9px;color:#185abc;cursor:pointer;font-size:12px;font-weight:800}.mt3__detail{margin-top:8px;padding:10px 12px;background:#f4f6f8;color:#3b4552;font-size:12px;white-space:pre-wrap}@media(max-width:760px){.mt3__answers{grid-template-columns:1fr}.mt3__answer{border-right:0;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9}}\n<\/style>\n<section class=\"mt3\" data-model-test-module=\"contract_analysis\"><header class=\"mt3__head\"><div><span>CONTRACT ANALYSIS<\/span><h3>Contract Analysis<\/h3><\/div><strong class=\"mt3__winner\">Winner: Fable 5<\/strong><\/header><div class=\"mt3__body\"><div class=\"mt3__answers\"><article class=\"mt3__answer\"><div class=\"mt3__model\"><strong>Opus 5<\/strong><span>25.69s \u00b7 1,800 tokens<\/span><\/div><p>Identified the deepest legal and commercial issues, then stopped during the first detailed risk item.<\/p><\/article><article class=\"mt3__answer\"><div class=\"mt3__model\"><strong>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/strong><span>25.54s \u00b7 1,569 tokens<\/span><\/div><p>Completed the executive summary, obligations, payment terms, termination, five risks, and clause-reference index.<\/p><\/article><article class=\"mt3__answer\"><div class=\"mt3__model\"><strong>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/strong><span>20.35s \u00b7 1,800 tokens<\/span><\/div><p>Produced a clear summary and customer obligations, then ended near the start of vendor obligations.<\/p><\/article><\/div><div class=\"mt3__table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Task-specific check<\/th><th>Opus 5<\/th><th>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/th><th>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><th>Executive summary<\/th><td>\u662f<\/td><td>\u662f<\/td><td>\u662f<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Both parties\u2019 obligations<\/th><td>\u90e8\u5206<\/td><td>\u5b8c\u6210<\/td><td>\u90e8\u5206<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Five risks<\/th><td>No \u2014 capped<\/td><td>\u5b8c\u6210<\/td><td>No \u2014 capped<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Reference index<\/th><td>No \u2014 capped<\/td><td>\u5b8c\u6210<\/td><td>No \u2014 capped<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><p class=\"mt3__verdict\">Fable 5 was the only complete answer under the shared limit. Opus is promising for deep issue spotting, but this run would have required continuation. The input was a 417-token contract excerpt, not a long-context stress test.<\/p><details><summary>\u67e5\u770b\u786e\u5207\u7684\u63d0\u793a\u8bed<\/summary><div class=\"mt3__detail\">Analyze the supplied SaaS contract excerpt. Return an executive summary, obligations by party, payment and termination terms, five prioritized risks with clause references, and a citation index.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>View full-run evidence<\/summary><div class=\"mt3__detail\">First valid outputs and metadata are preserved in api-test\/results.jsonl. No retry was used to replace a valid output.<\/div><\/details><\/div><\/section>\n\n\n\n<style>.mt-evidence-audit,.mt-evidence-audit *{box-sizing:border-box}.mt-evidence-audit{width:100%;overflow:hidden;border:1px solid #dce2e9;border-radius:8px;background:#fff;color:#1b2028;font-family:Inter,-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,\"Segoe UI\",sans-serif}.mt-evidence-audit__head{padding:13px 16px;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9;background:#f4f6f8}.mt-evidence-audit__head span{display:block;color:#176b45;font-size:10px;font-weight:800}.mt-evidence-audit h3{margin:3px 0 0;font-size:17px}.mt-evidence-audit__body{padding:14px 16px 16px}.mt-evidence-audit__table-wrap{overflow-x:auto}.mt-evidence-audit table{width:100%;min-width:720px;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:12px}.mt-evidence-audit th,.mt-evidence-audit td{padding:8px 9px;border:1px solid #dce2e9;text-align:left;vertical-align:top}.mt-evidence-audit th{background:#f4f6f8}.mt-evidence-audit__summary{margin:12px 0 0;padding:10px 12px;border-left:4px solid #176b45;background:#eaf7f0;color:#3b4552;font-size:13px;line-height:1.6}<\/style>\n<section class=\"mt-evidence-audit\" data-model-test-module=\"structured-extraction\"><header class=\"mt-evidence-audit__head\"><span>STRUCTURED OUTPUT AUDIT<\/span><h3>Strict JSON Extraction<\/h3><\/header><div class=\"mt-evidence-audit__body\"><div class=\"mt-evidence-audit__table-wrap\"><table><thead><tr><th>\u68c0\u67e5<\/th><th>Opus 5<\/th><th>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/th><th>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><th>Valid JSON only<\/th><td>Fail \u2014 code fence<\/td><td>Fail \u2014 code fence<\/td><td>Fail \u2014 code fence<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Schema discipline<\/th><td>Added incorrect model warning<\/td><td>Added incorrect model warning<\/td><td>Put \u201call chat models\u201d inside model array<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Uncertainty field<\/th><td>Present<\/td><td>Present<\/td><td>Missing for Pro<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>\u5ef6\u8fdf<\/th><td>11.07s<\/td><td>12.48s<\/td><td>8.32s<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><p class=\"mt-evidence-audit__summary\"><strong>No clean winner.<\/strong> All three broke the strict \u201cJSON only\u201d contract. Sonnet was fastest, but speed does not compensate for a schema error. Production automation should validate the response against a schema and retry or reject invalid output.<\/p><details><summary>\u67e5\u770b\u786e\u5207\u7684\u63d0\u793a\u8bed<\/summary><div style=\"margin-top:8px;padding:10px 12px;background:#f4f6f8;font-size:12px;white-space:pre-wrap\">Extract the supplied GlobalGPT plan facts into the requested JSON schema. Return JSON only, without Markdown fences. Preserve uncertainty instead of inventing missing facts.<\/div><\/details><\/div><\/section>\n\n\n\n<style>\n.mt3,.mt3 *{box-sizing:border-box}.mt3{width:100%;overflow:hidden;border:1px solid #dce2e9;border-radius:8px;background:#fff;color:#1b2028;font-family:Inter,-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,\"Segoe UI\",sans-serif}.mt3__head{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;gap:18px;padding:14px 16px;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3__head span{display:block;color:#185abc;font-size:10px;font-weight:800;text-transform:uppercase}.mt3 h3{margin:3px 0 0;font-size:18px}.mt3__winner{align-self:flex-start;padding:5px 8px;border-radius:8px;background:#fff4d6;color:#7a5100;font-size:11px}.mt3__body{padding:14px 16px 16px}.mt3__answers{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(3,1fr);border:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3__answer{min-width:0;padding:14px;border-right:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3__answer:last-child{border-right:0}.mt3__model{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;gap:8px}.mt3__model strong{font-size:13px}.mt3__model span{color:#185abc;font-size:12px;font-weight:800}.mt3__answer p{margin:9px 0 0;color:#3b4552;font-size:13px;line-height:1.6}.mt3__table{overflow-x:auto}.mt3 table{width:100%;min-width:720px;margin-top:12px;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:12px}.mt3 th,.mt3 td{padding:8px 9px;border:1px solid #dce2e9;text-align:left;vertical-align:top}.mt3 th{background:#f4f6f8}.mt3__verdict{margin:12px 0 0;padding:11px 12px;border-left:4px solid #7a5100;background:#fff4d6;color:#3b4552;font-size:13px;line-height:1.6}.mt3 details{margin-top:10px;border-top:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt3 summary{padding-top:9px;color:#185abc;cursor:pointer;font-size:12px;font-weight:800}.mt3__detail{margin-top:8px;padding:10px 12px;background:#f4f6f8;color:#3b4552;font-size:12px;white-space:pre-wrap}@media(max-width:760px){.mt3__answers{grid-template-columns:1fr}.mt3__answer{border-right:0;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9}}\n<\/style>\n<section class=\"mt3\" data-model-test-module=\"seo_workflow\"><header class=\"mt3__head\"><div><span>SEO WORKFLOW<\/span><h3>Seo Workflow<\/h3><\/div><strong class=\"mt3__winner\">Best editorial judgment: Opus 5<\/strong><\/header><div class=\"mt3__body\"><div class=\"mt3__answers\"><article class=\"mt3__answer\"><div class=\"mt3__model\"><strong>Opus 5<\/strong><span>28.55s \u00b7 1,800 tokens<\/span><\/div><p>Built the strongest structure and editorial safeguards and did not invent an incorrect publication year. The pricing section was cut off.<\/p><\/article><article class=\"mt3__answer\"><div class=\"mt3__model\"><strong>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/strong><span>30.18s \u00b7 1,800 tokens<\/span><\/div><p>Produced a useful commercial outline but inserted 2025 into a fresh 2026 topic and hit the output limit.<\/p><\/article><article class=\"mt3__answer\"><div class=\"mt3__model\"><strong>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/strong><span>26.62s \u00b7 1,800 tokens<\/span><\/div><p>Created a clear outline and product-access section, but also inserted 2025 and stopped before completing the brief.<\/p><\/article><\/div><div class=\"mt3__table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Task-specific check<\/th><th>Opus 5<\/th><th>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/th><th>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><th>Correct year handling<\/th><td>\u901a\u8fc7<\/td><td>Fail \u2014 added 2025<\/td><td>Fail \u2014 added 2025<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Search intent<\/th><td>\u5f3a\u5927<\/td><td>\u5f3a\u5927<\/td><td>\u5f3a\u5927<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Editorial safeguards<\/th><td>\u6700\u4f73<\/td><td>\u826f\u597d<\/td><td>\u826f\u597d<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Complete deliverable<\/th><td>No \u2014 capped<\/td><td>No \u2014 capped<\/td><td>No \u2014 capped<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><p class=\"mt3__verdict\">Opus 5 showed the best editorial judgment, but none completed the full brief under the output ceiling. For publishable SEO work, use a fact checklist and section-by-section generation instead of assuming one long answer will finish cleanly.<\/p><details><summary>\u67e5\u770b\u786e\u5207\u7684\u63d0\u793a\u8bed<\/summary><div class=\"mt3__detail\">Create a detailed SEO content brief for Claude Opus 5 vs Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 using the supplied keywords, product facts, pricing requirements, test plan, and evidence boundaries. Do not invent dates or unverified data.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>View full-run evidence<\/summary><div class=\"mt3__detail\">First valid outputs and metadata are preserved in api-test\/results.jsonl. No retry was used to replace a valid output.<\/div><\/details><\/div><\/section>\n\n\n\n<style>.mt-aggregate-verdict,.mt-aggregate-verdict *{box-sizing:border-box}.mt-aggregate-verdict{width:100%;overflow:hidden;border:1px solid #dce2e9;border-radius:8px;background:#fff;color:#1b2028;font-family:Inter,-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,\"Segoe UI\",sans-serif}.mt-aggregate-verdict__head{padding:13px 16px;border-bottom:1px solid #dce2e9;background:#f4f6f8}.mt-aggregate-verdict__head span{display:block;color:#7a5100;font-size:10px;font-weight:800}.mt-aggregate-verdict h3{margin:3px 0 0;font-size:18px}.mt-aggregate-verdict__body{padding:14px 16px 16px}.mt-aggregate-verdict__dimensions{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(4,1fr);border:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt-aggregate-verdict__dimension{padding:11px 12px;border-right:1px solid #dce2e9}.mt-aggregate-verdict__dimension:last-child{border-right:0}.mt-aggregate-verdict__dimension span{display:block;color:#606a78;font-size:9px;font-weight:800;text-transform:uppercase}.mt-aggregate-verdict__dimension strong{display:block;margin-top:3px;font-size:13px}.mt-aggregate-verdict__best-for{margin:12px 0 0;padding:11px 12px;border-left:4px solid #185abc;background:#edf4ff;color:#3b4552;font-size:13px;line-height:1.6}.mt-aggregate-verdict__limits{margin:9px 0 0;color:#606a78;font-size:12px}@media(max-width:700px){.mt-aggregate-verdict__dimensions{grid-template-columns:1fr 1fr}}<\/style>\n<section class=\"mt-aggregate-verdict\" data-model-test-module=\"aggregate-verdict\"><header class=\"mt-aggregate-verdict__head\"><span>FIVE-TASK RESULT<\/span><h3>No Single Model Won Every Workflow<\/h3><\/header><div class=\"mt-aggregate-verdict__body\"><div class=\"mt-aggregate-verdict__dimensions\"><div class=\"mt-aggregate-verdict__dimension\"><span>\u7f16\u7801<\/span><strong>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/strong><\/div><div class=\"mt-aggregate-verdict__dimension\"><span>\u89c4\u5212<\/span><strong>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/strong><\/div><div class=\"mt-aggregate-verdict__dimension\"><span>Contract<\/span><strong>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/strong><\/div><div class=\"mt-aggregate-verdict__dimension\"><span>SEO judgment<\/span><strong>Opus 5<\/strong><\/div><\/div><p class=\"mt-aggregate-verdict__best-for\"><strong>Best fit:<\/strong> Sonnet for fast, scoped execution; Fable for completion-heavy planning and analysis; Opus for deep professional judgment. Strict structured output needs validation regardless of model.<\/p><p class=\"mt-aggregate-verdict__limits\">15\/15 calls succeeded. This was one first output per task and model, with a 1,800-token ceiling\u2014not a repeat-run stability study.<\/p><\/div><\/section>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"coding-agents\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Opus 5 vs Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 for Coding and Agents<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Our coding result favored Sonnet for a tightly defined repair, while Fable won the broader agent plan. That is the clearest reason to choose by workflow instead of model prestige.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Sonnet 5:<\/strong> use for frequent edits, tests, tool calls, and clear tickets where latency matters.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Opus 5:<\/strong> use for difficult debugging, architecture review, ambiguous repositories, and work requiring careful self-checks.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Fable 5:<\/strong> use for long, loosely specified, multi-file or multi-agent projects where completing the plan matters more than speed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">CodeRabbit\u2019s Opus 5 review illustrates another trade-off. Actionable precision reached 39.3% versus a 35.2% production baseline, but known-issue coverage was 55.2% versus 61.1%. It also generated 92 nitpicks versus 23. More comments can reveal subtle issues, but they also increase review load.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1280\" height=\"1098\" src=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-coderabbit-code-review.webp\" alt=\"Claude Opus 5 code review benchmark by CodeRabbit\" class=\"wp-image-17222\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-coderabbit-code-review.webp 1280w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-coderabbit-code-review-300x257.webp 300w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-coderabbit-code-review-1024x878.webp 1024w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-coderabbit-code-review-768x659.webp 768w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/opus-5-coderabbit-code-review-14x12.webp 14w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">CodeRabbit found a trade-off between actionable precision, issue coverage, and nitpick volume.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"user-reports\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Early Users Are Saying on Reddit and X<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Early reports are mixed in a useful way: they describe different model personalities rather than a unanimous winner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A Claude Code user found Opus capable at implementation but said it needed clearer goals than Fable to reach the right conclusion.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A MineBench poster reported that Opus took more attempts and longer than Fable on a specific build set, although the final construction quality remained competitive.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Several Claude Code discussions describe a practical split: Fable for planning or unusually complex bugs, Opus for direct advanced coding.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Box reported private partner gains for Opus 5 over Opus 4.8 across legal, technical, medical, life-science, and due-diligence work. Those results are useful signals, not public reproducible benchmarks.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Because Opus 5 was released only days before this comparison, these reports should guide what you test\u2014not replace testing on your own repository, documents, or prompts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"which-model\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which Claude Model Should You Choose?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>\u9009\u62e9<\/th><th>\u4f55\u65f6<\/th><th>Avoid paying extra when<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>\u300aFable 5\u300b<\/strong><\/td><td>The task is ambiguous, long-running, high-stakes, and hard to review manually<\/td><td>A clear prompt can be completed reliably by Opus or Sonnet<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Opus 5<\/strong><\/td><td>You need deep professional analysis or advanced coding without Fable\u2019s full premium<\/td><td>The work is high-volume and acceptance criteria are simple<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>\u7b2c5\u9996\u5341\u56db\u884c\u8bd7<\/strong><\/td><td>You need speed, low token rates, clear execution, or large production volume<\/td><td>Failure would require expensive human review or repeated replanning<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Is Opus 5 better than Fable 5?<\/strong> Not universally. Opus is the better value and leads some independent professional-agent results; Fable remains the safer bet for the hardest planning and completion-heavy tasks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Is Opus 5 better than Sonnet 5?<\/strong> In capability ceiling, generally yes. For a clear coding ticket or large-volume workflow, Sonnet may deliver a better business result because it is faster and cheaper.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"globalgpt\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Build a Complete AI Workflow with Claude, Image, and Video Models in GlobalGPT<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The test suggests a more useful strategy than choosing one permanent winner: use the best model for each stage. GlobalGPT\u2019s Basic plan<a href=\"https:\/\/www.glbgpt.com\/home\/claude-opus-5?inviter=hub_claude5&amp;login=1\"> includes Claude Opus 5<\/a>, Fable 5, and Sonnet 5, so you can move from fast execution to deeper review and complex planning without switching between separate subscriptions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The workflow does not have to stop at text. GlobalGPT also brings image and video generation into the same workspace, with access to model families such as GPT Image, Nano Banana, Sora, Kling, Seedance, Wan, and Grok Imagine depending on the current catalog and plan. That means one project can move from research and scripting to visual concepts, production images, and finished video without rebuilding the workflow in a different platform.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<style>\n.glb-four-stage,\n.glb-four-stage * {\n  box-sizing: border-box;\n}\n\n.glb-four-stage {\n  width: 100%;\n  margin: 24px 0;\n  padding: 18px;\n  border: 1px solid #dce2e9;\n  border-radius: 8px;\n  background: #ffffff;\n  color: #1b2028;\n  font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, \"Segoe UI\", sans-serif;\n}\n\n.glb-four-stage__track {\n  display: grid;\n  grid-template-columns: repeat(4, minmax(0, 1fr));\n  gap: 16px;\n}\n\n.glb-four-stage__step {\n  position: relative;\n  min-width: 0;\n  padding: 16px;\n  border: 1px solid #dce2e9;\n  background: #f7f8fa;\n}\n\n.glb-four-stage__step:not(:last-child)::after {\n  content: \"\u2192\";\n  position: absolute;\n  top: 50%;\n  right: -20px;\n  z-index: 2;\n  width: 24px;\n  transform: translateY(-50%);\n  background: #ffffff;\n  color: #606a78;\n  text-align: center;\n  font-size: 22px;\n  font-weight: 800;\n  line-height: 1;\n}\n\n.glb-four-stage__step span {\n  display: block;\n  color: #606a78;\n  font-size: 11px;\n  font-weight: 800;\n  letter-spacing: .02em;\n  text-transform: uppercase;\n}\n\n.glb-four-stage__step strong {\n  display: block;\n  margin-top: 5px;\n  font-size: 16px;\n  line-height: 1.35;\n}\n\n.glb-four-stage__step p {\n  margin: 9px 0 0;\n  color: #48515e;\n  font-size: 13px;\n  line-height: 1.6;\n}\n\n.glb-four-stage__route {\n  margin: 16px 0 0;\n  padding: 13px 14px;\n  border-left: 4px solid #185abc;\n  background: #edf4ff;\n  color: #3b4552;\n  font-size: 13px;\n  line-height: 1.6;\n}\n\n@media (max-width: 900px) {\n  .glb-four-stage__track {\n    grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;\n  }\n\n  .glb-four-stage__step:not(:last-child)::after {\n    display: none;\n  }\n}\n\n@media (max-width: 520px) {\n  .glb-four-stage {\n    padding: 12px;\n  }\n\n  .glb-four-stage__track {\n    grid-template-columns: 1fr;\n  }\n}\n<\/style>\n\n<section class=\"glb-four-stage\" aria-label=\"GlobalGPT complete multi-model workflow\">\n  <div class=\"glb-four-stage__track\">\n    <article class=\"glb-four-stage__step\">\n      <span>1 \u00b7 Plan<\/span>\n      <strong>\u514b\u52b3\u5fb7\u00b7\u6cd5\u5e03\u5c14 5<\/strong>\n      <p>Resolve ambiguity, dependencies, and the hardest strategic decisions.<\/p>\n    <\/article>\n\n    <article class=\"glb-four-stage__step\">\n      <span>2 \u00b7 Execute<\/span>\n      <strong>\u514b\u52b3\u5fb7\u00b7\u6851\u5185\u7279 5<\/strong>\n      <p>Handle fast coding, drafting, tool use, and repeatable production work.<\/p>\n    <\/article>\n\n    <article class=\"glb-four-stage__step\">\n      <span>3 \u00b7 Review<\/span>\n      <strong>Claude Opus 5<\/strong>\n      <p>Apply deeper analysis, fact checks, and professional editorial judgment.<\/p>\n    <\/article>\n\n    <article class=\"glb-four-stage__step\">\n      <span>4 \u00b7 Produce<\/span>\n      <strong>Image + video models<\/strong>\n      <p>Turn the approved concept into visuals, clips, and final creative assets.<\/p>\n    <\/article>\n  <\/div>\n\n  <p class=\"glb-four-stage__route\"><strong>One workspace, task-based routing:<\/strong> use the strongest model for each step instead of forcing one model to handle the entire project.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">GlobalGPT Pro extends the workspace to almost every available video model such as seedance 2.0, sora 2, flux and so on. You can also connect the CLI after registration and call supported models from Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor\/MCP-style agent workflows; successful calls consume credits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.glbgpt.com\/home?inviter=hub_content_home&amp;login=1\"><strong>Explore the GlobalGPT multi-model workspace<\/strong><\/a>&nbsp;and test the same project across text, image, video, and agent workflows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1280\" height=\"912\" src=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/globalgpt-basic-pro-model-access.webp\" alt=\"GlobalGPT Basic and Pro pricing comparison\" class=\"wp-image-17223\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/globalgpt-basic-pro-model-access.webp 1280w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/globalgpt-basic-pro-model-access-300x214.webp 300w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/globalgpt-basic-pro-model-access-1024x730.webp 1024w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/globalgpt-basic-pro-model-access-768x547.webp 768w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/globalgpt-basic-pro-model-access-18x12.webp 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">GlobalGPT Basic focuses on LLM access, while Pro extends the workspace to almost every video model except Veo 3.1.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and CLI access<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">You can connect the GlobalGPT CLI after registration, even without purchasing a plan. Successful model calls consume credits: the subscription controls the available model range, while credits pay for actual calls. That makes it possible to select models inside Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor\/MCP-style agent workflows without treating GlobalGPT as a replacement for every feature in those native products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1280\" height=\"1230\" src=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/globalgpt-cli-agent-workflow.webp\" alt=\"GlobalGPT CLI integration with Claude Code Codex and Cursor\" class=\"wp-image-17225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/globalgpt-cli-agent-workflow.webp 1280w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/globalgpt-cli-agent-workflow-300x288.webp 300w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/globalgpt-cli-agent-workflow-1024x984.webp 1024w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/globalgpt-cli-agent-workflow-768x738.webp 768w, https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/globalgpt-cli-agent-workflow-12x12.webp 12w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">GlobalGPT CLI and MCP let users select models inside coding-agent and automation workflows.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<style>.cta{padding:26px;background:#17142c;color:#fff;border-radius:8px;margin:30px 0}.cta a{display:inline-block;background:#fff;color:#2f1d9b;padding:10px 16px;border-radius:5px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700}<\/style>\n<div class=\"cta\"><h3>Test the same prompt across models<\/h3><p>Start with Sonnet for speed, move to Opus when judgment matters, and call Fable when the task becomes genuinely difficult.<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.glbgpt.com\/home?inviter=hub_content_home&amp;login=1\">Try the multi-model workspace<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"final-verdict\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">\u6700\u7ec8\u7ed3\u8bba<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Choose Opus 5 for the best overall balance, Fable 5 for the hardest autonomous work, and Sonnet 5 for speed and scale.<\/strong> Public benchmarks make Opus and Fable look close, while our hands-on test exposed meaningful workflow differences: Sonnet won coding, Fable won planning and contract completion, and Opus showed the strongest SEO editorial judgment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The most cost-effective answer is not always the cheapest model or the highest benchmark score. Start with the lowest-cost model that reliably completes the task, then escalate only when better reasoning saves more than it costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Updated July 27, 2026. API pricing and model availability can change; Sonnet 5\u2019s introductory API pricing is scheduled to end August 31, 2026.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"faq\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">\u5e38\u89c1\u95ee\u9898<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<style>.faq details{border-top:1px solid #dfe3eb;padding:15px 0}.faq summary{font-weight:700;cursor:pointer}<\/style>\n<div class=\"faq\">\n<details><summary>Is Opus 5 better than Fable 5?<\/summary><p>Opus 5 is a better value for many professional tasks and leads Fable 5 on some independent agent benchmarks. Fable 5 still has the higher capability positioning and completed our planning and contract-analysis tests more fully. Choose Opus as the premium default; choose Fable for the hardest ambiguous work.<\/p><\/details>\n<details><summary>Is Opus 5 better than Sonnet 5?<\/summary><p>Opus 5 has a higher capability ceiling and is better suited to difficult analysis, advanced coding, and high-value professional work. Sonnet 5 is faster and cheaper, and it won our tightly scoped coding test. Sonnet can be the better choice when the task is clear and volume matters.<\/p><\/details>\n<details><summary>Is Fable 5 worth twice the price of Opus 5?<\/summary><p>Only when its extra planning depth or completion quality prevents expensive failure or rework. Fable\u2019s API token rates are twice Opus 5\u2019s. For routine advanced work, Opus usually offers the stronger price-to-capability balance; test Fable on the small set of tasks where Opus falls short.<\/p><\/details>\n<details><summary>Which Claude model is best for coding?<\/summary><p>Sonnet 5 is excellent for fast, clearly scoped coding and produced the best complete result in our debug test. Opus 5 is the stronger default for difficult debugging and architectural judgment. Fable 5 fits long autonomous builds and complex multi-step orchestration where cost and latency are secondary.<\/p><\/details>\n<details><summary>Which Claude model is fastest?<\/summary><p>Sonnet 5 is the fastest of the three. It averaged 19.04 seconds across our five API tasks, compared with 24.23 seconds for Opus 5 and 24.45 seconds for Fable 5. Actual latency varies with prompt length, output length, effort, provider load, and tools.<\/p><\/details>\n<details><summary>Which Claude model is best overall?<\/summary><p>Opus 5 is the best overall choice for users who want premium Claude capability without paying Fable 5 rates on every call. Fable 5 has the highest ceiling, while Sonnet 5 offers the best speed and value. The best operational setup uses different models for different task stages.<\/p><\/details>\n<details><summary>Is Opus 5 better than Opus 4.8?<\/summary><p>Opus 5 improves agentic coding, computer use, and professional-work performance while retaining Opus 4.8\u2019s standard API price. That makes it the more capable option on paper. Production teams should still test their own prompts because higher reasoning depth can change output length, latency, and workflow behavior.<\/p><\/details>\n<details><summary>Can I use Opus 5, Fable 5, and Sonnet 5 in GlobalGPT?<\/summary><p>Yes. GlobalGPT Basic includes all three latest Claude models and focuses on LLM access. Registration also lets you connect the CLI; successful calls require credits. Pro extends access to almost every video model except Veo 3.1, creating a broader text, coding, image, and video workflow.<\/p><\/details>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\n    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n    \"mainEntity\": [\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Is Opus 5 better than Fable 5?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Opus 5 is a better value for many professional tasks and leads Fable 5 on some independent agent benchmarks. Fable 5 still has the higher capability positioning and completed our planning and contract-analysis tests more fully. Choose Opus as the premium default; choose Fable for the hardest ambiguous work.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Is Opus 5 better than Sonnet 5?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Opus 5 has a higher capability ceiling and is better suited to difficult analysis, advanced coding, and high-value professional work. Sonnet 5 is faster and cheaper, and it won our tightly scoped coding test. Sonnet can be the better choice when the task is clear and volume matters.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Is Fable 5 worth twice the price of Opus 5?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Only when its extra planning depth or completion quality prevents expensive failure or rework. Fable\\u2019s API token rates are twice Opus 5\\u2019s. For routine advanced work, Opus usually offers the stronger price-to-capability balance; test Fable on the small set of tasks where Opus falls short.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Which Claude model is best for coding?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Sonnet 5 is excellent for fast, clearly scoped coding and produced the best complete result in our debug test. Opus 5 is the stronger default for difficult debugging and architectural judgment. Fable 5 fits long autonomous builds and complex multi-step orchestration where cost and latency are secondary.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Which Claude model is fastest?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Sonnet 5 is the fastest of the three. It averaged 19.04 seconds across our five API tasks, compared with 24.23 seconds for Opus 5 and 24.45 seconds for Fable 5. Actual latency varies with prompt length, output length, effort, provider load, and tools.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Which Claude model is best overall?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Opus 5 is the best overall choice for users who want premium Claude capability without paying Fable 5 rates on every call. Fable 5 has the highest ceiling, while Sonnet 5 offers the best speed and value. The best operational setup uses different models for different task stages.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Is Opus 5 better than Opus 4.8?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Opus 5 improves agentic coding, computer use, and professional-work performance while retaining Opus 4.8\\u2019s standard API price. That makes it the more capable option on paper. Production teams should still test their own prompts because higher reasoning depth can change output length, latency, and workflow behavior.\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Question\",\n            \"name\": \"Can I use Opus 5, Fable 5, and Sonnet 5 in GlobalGPT?\",\n            \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                \"text\": \"Yes. GlobalGPT Basic includes all three latest Claude models and focuses on LLM access. Registration also lets you connect the CLI; successful calls require credits. Pro extends access to almost every video model except Veo 3.1, creating a broader text, coding, image, and video workflow.\"\n            }\n        }\n    ]\n}<\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Opus 5 is the best default for high-value professional work, Fable 5 is the strongest choice when maximum capability matters more than price, and Sonnet 5 is the best value for fast, clearly scoped tasks.\u00a0Our 15-call API test reinforced that split: no model won every workflow. BEST OVERALLClaude Opus 5Deep analysis and strong editorial judgment [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":17220,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ai-chat"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17206"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17206\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17228,"href":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17206\/revisions\/17228"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17220"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}