{"id":18437,"date":"2026-08-25T03:59:55","date_gmt":"2026-08-25T07:59:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/?p=18437"},"modified":"2026-08-25T03:59:55","modified_gmt":"2026-08-25T07:59:55","slug":"wan-3-0-pricing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wp.glbgpt.com\/es\/hub\/wan-3-0-pricing","title":{"rendered":"WAN 3.0: precios, planes y coste de las pruebas reales"},"content":{"rendered":"

WAN 3.0 pricing has three different layers, and mixing them is the fastest way to get the wrong answer. The official Wan pricing page<\/a> lists consumer plans; the official credits page<\/a> lists credit packs; and a hosted API or third-party platform can price the same model differently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For a practical reference point, we ran two completed WAN 3.0 text-to-video jobs through GlobalGPT’s direct task API on August 24, 2026. At 480P and 16:9, the returned platform price was $0.70 for 5 seconds<\/strong> y $1.40 for 10 seconds<\/strong>. The corresponding GlobalGPT creation surface shows 700 credits<\/strong> y 1,400 credits<\/strong> for those same two configurations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is a platform test, not an Alibaba official API quote. If you are still deciding whether WAN 3.0 fits your workflow, start with the broader WAN 3.0 release, features, and access guide<\/a> and use this page for the cost detail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Inicio<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Plataforma de inteligencia artificial todo en uno para escribir, generar im\u00e1genes y v\u00eddeos con GPT-5, Nano Banana, etc.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
Pruebe m\u00e1s de 100 modelos de IA en Global GPT<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

WAN 3.0 pricing at a glance<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Pricing snapshot \u00b7 tested Aug 24, 2026<\/div>\n
\n
Official Wan Pro<\/div>
$5\/mo<\/span><\/div>
Annual billing \u00b7 300 credits\/mo<\/div><\/div>\n
GlobalGPT test T1<\/div>
$0.70<\/div>
5s \u00b7 480P \u00b7 16:9 \u00b7 700 credits shown<\/div><\/div>\n
GlobalGPT test T2<\/div>
$1.40<\/div>
10s \u00b7 480P \u00b7 16:9 \u00b7 1,400 credits shown<\/div><\/div>\n <\/div>\n

Different billing systems are shown side by side for planning, not converted into an equivalent currency. Official Wan plans and completed GlobalGPT API jobs are different routes.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n

Ruta<\/th>\u00bfQu\u00e9 se verifica?<\/th>Precio<\/th>L\u00edmite importante<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Wan.video Free<\/td>Plan oficial para los consumidores<\/td>$0\/mes<\/td>Consumer product, not an API rate<\/td><\/tr>
Wan.video Pro annual billing<\/td>Plan oficial para los consumidores<\/td>$5\/month; 300 credits\/month<\/td>Page also displays a $10 reference price<\/td><\/tr>
Wan.video Premium annual billing<\/td>Plan oficial para los consumidores<\/td>$20\/month; 1,200 credits\/month<\/td>Page also displays a $40 reference price<\/td><\/tr>
Wan credit packs<\/td>Official consumer credits<\/td>$1.50 for 30 credits to $100 for 3,900 credits<\/td>Credit-pack rules apply<\/td><\/tr>
GlobalGPT direct API test<\/td>Completed 480P, 16:9 text-to-video test<\/td>$0.70 \/ 5s; $1.40 \/ 10s<\/td>A tested platform result, not Alibaba’s official API tariff<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div>\n\n\n\n

The official plan cards say that the annual-billing Pro plan includes 300 credits per month and Premium includes 1,200. Before using plan labels as a production budget, check the model and settings shown inside the creation screen: a generic \u201cup to videos\u201d estimate is not a guaranteed number of WAN 3.0 outputs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Official Wan credits and membership plans<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Wan.video currently offers a Free plan plus annual-billing Pro and Premium plans. The official product page displays Pro at $5\/month when billed yearly and Premium at $20\/month when billed yearly. Those cards show 300 and 1,200 credits per month respectively. See the p\u00e1gina oficial de precios<\/a> for the current plan presentation and included allowances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you prefer a one-off purchase, the official Wan credits page<\/a> lists these packs:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Total credits<\/th>Listed price<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
30<\/td>$1.50<\/td><\/tr>
150<\/td>$5<\/td><\/tr>
300<\/td>$10<\/td><\/tr>
660<\/td>$20<\/td><\/tr>
1,800<\/td>$50<\/td><\/tr>
3,900<\/td>$100<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div>\n\n\n\n

The same page says redeemed credits are not refundable, transferable, or withdrawable, and have a two-year validity period. Those terms matter if you are buying credits for a sporadic campaign rather than running a steady production queue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Official
Official Wan membership plans, checked August 24, 2026.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"Official
Official Wan credit packs and redemption terms, checked August 24, 2026.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

What our GlobalGPT WAN 3.0 API tests cost<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

We used a fixed English prompt, text-to-video mode, 480P resolution, 16:9 aspect ratio, and audio disabled. The second test changed only the requested duration. Both jobs completed successfully through the WanAli<\/code> upstream route.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prueba<\/th>Duraci\u00f3n solicitada<\/th>Verified output duration<\/th>Returned API platform price<\/th>Matching GlobalGPT UI price<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
T1<\/td>5 segundos<\/td>5.04 seconds<\/td>$0.70<\/td>700 credits<\/td><\/tr>
T2<\/td>10 segundos<\/td>10.03 seconds<\/td>$1.40<\/td>1,400 credits<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div>\n\n\n\n

For this tested configuration, the observed platform price works out to $0.14 per requested second<\/strong>, o 140 credits per requested second<\/strong>. That is useful for rough 480P text-to-video planning, but it is not a universal WAN 3.0 rate. Resolution, audio, reference inputs, retries, plan type, and future pricing changes can alter the result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
Completed API test \u00b7 same prompt, one controlled variable<\/div>\n
\n
T1 \u00b7 5 seconds<\/strong>

5.04s final output
$0.70 returned price
700 credits in the creation surface<\/p><\/div>\n

\u2192<\/div>\n
T2 \u00b7 10 seconds<\/strong>

10.03s final output
$1.40 returned price
1,400 credits in the creation surface<\/p><\/div>\n <\/div>\n

The practical pattern in this narrow test was linear: double the requested duration, double the returned platform price. Resolution, audio, reference assets, and editing modes were held out of this comparison.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n

\"Representative
T1 output: 5-second request.<\/figcaption><\/figure>
\"Representative
T2 output: 10-second request.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

For context on why a single video-model subscription can be easier to budget than separate tools, compare other workflows in our La mejor gu\u00eda sobre generadores de v\u00eddeo con IA<\/a> and our explanation of AI video-to-video workflows<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is GlobalGPT cheaper than the official route?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

There is no honest raw-credit comparison: Wan.video credits and GlobalGPT credits belong to different billing systems. What we can say is narrower and more useful:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. The official Wan consumer route sells memberships and Wan credits.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Our completed GlobalGPT tests returned $0.70 and $1.40 for two concrete WAN 3.0 jobs, with the matching creation-surface prices shown as 700 and 1,400 credits.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. GlobalGPT lets a creator use other video models from the same account, so a team does not need to fund a separate provider balance just to compare a WAN shot with another workflow.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    That flexibility matters when the brief changes. You may start with WAN 3.0 for a reference-driven shot, then compare it with a Seedance 2.0 pricing workflow<\/a>, a Veo 3.1 access route<\/a>, o un Gemini Omni Flash vs. Veo 3.1 test<\/a>. The value claim is the shared platform workflow\u2014not an assertion that one provider’s credits are equivalent to another’s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Prueba GlobalGPT<\/a> if you want to run WAN 3.0 alongside other video models from one account.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    What about official WAN 3.0 API pricing?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Do not treat the official Wan membership table as an API rate card. We confirmed the official consumer plans and credit packs above, but did not find a current official Alibaba Model Studio row that publishes a WAN 3.0 API unit price for the exact tested configuration. Until Alibaba publishes that same-field rate, this article does not convert Wan.video credits into an API price or present the GlobalGPT test price as an official Alibaba price.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    If you need an API budget today, use the price returned by your own task submission, lock the exact settings in a test job, and record the date. This is especially important for longer clips: the current WAN 3.0 product overview discusses native 30-second generation, but a 30-second capability claim does not by itself establish a 30-second API bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    A practical cost model for real projects<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The cheapest clip is not always the cheapest project. A short paid test becomes expensive when a team has not decided its shot list, aspect ratio, and approval process before generating. Start by separating three budgets:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    1. Exploration budget.<\/strong> This is the money for trying motion ideas, camera language, and subject consistency. In our test setup, one 5-second 480P run provided a clean baseline at $0.70. Use a small fixed number of attempts before a creative review instead of generating endlessly.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    2. Selection budget.<\/strong> Keep the prompt and settings stable while comparing variants. That lets you tell whether a better result came from the model, the prompt, or simply a different duration.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    3. Delivery budget.<\/strong> Only after a shot is chosen should you pay for a longer duration, a higher resolution, or a reference-driven version. This is where a 10-second run is useful: our matched test returned $1.40, exactly twice the five-second price.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

      If your project needs a sequence rather than one hero shot, plan the clips as a set. A 30-second social video may be cheaper to control as three independently approved ten-second shots than as one long first attempt\u2014especially when a client changes the opening, CTA, or product angle late in the process. The right choice depends on continuity requirements, so run your own short test before committing to a long render.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Choose your starting route<\/div>
      Trying WAN for the first time<\/strong>

      Use an official credit pack or a single controlled platform test.<\/p><\/div>

      Comparing several models<\/strong>

      Use one account and keep the prompt, duration, and ratio unchanged.<\/p><\/div>

      Producing paid deliverables<\/strong>

      Test your final resolution, audio choice, and reference inputs before bulk rendering.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/section>\n\n\n\n

      Hidden costs to plan for<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      The first render is rarely the entire budget. Reserve room for:<\/p>\n\n\n\n